You would

The material conditions being what allowed romanticism to take root.

okay, yeah won't change my comment then.

btw I take it you mean romanticism by pretty much a culture being created in the nation-state right?

I don't really see why mercantilism is any more nationalist than any other foreign policy that's expansionist and aggressive, it just coopts New World and Asian markets for national gain.

Yeah.

Greetings my ni🅱 🅱as

Guys

Syndicalist gang

Isn't syndicalism fairly cloe to Brazillian Integralism

close

>I don't really see why mercantilism is any more nationalist than any other foreign policy that's expansionist and aggressive, it just coopts New World and Asian markets for national gain.

I'd say it's essentially the philosophy behind it, it's focused less on growth, and more on storage, it wants to store as much wealth as possible, it wants an accumulation of wealth and material because this is what it defines as a strong economy, it's more nationalistic since it's based on accumulation of wealth of it's nation-state, no? And I think it's different to other systems because, like now, the view is more on growth, the view is more on produce and store the least amount as possible, it looks like a 180, and it kind of even is tbh since the fact of the matter is that it's focus is on "selling" nationalism outgrew it's use after Wealth of Nations, that's my point.

It's not any more nationalistic than anything else that wants to further national strength.

So i'ts not a departure from pre-mercantilist foreign policies.

It's the same principle.

we're talking about the economic system though, my point now is on why i think nation-states is a bourgoiesie creation.

Nationism is the answer to the franchise problem the right wing has in America.

>pre-mercantilist foreign policy

there was no foreign policy pre-mercantilism, it was feudalistic, you may have had merchants, but there was no foreign policy, I don't even think they would've been able to grasp of an idea of foreign policy

Soreliansim sorta is. @Gas the Zoomers
Syndicalism itself is (for a lack of a better term) Left Wing Socialism but replace the Government with Worker Unions and Syndicates

kind of based ^

Contrasted with nationalism – nationism pertains to practical concerns, while nationalism pertains to questions of identity.

never heard of nationism

You've heard of it now

i've heard of it now 😄

Since an ethnostate is out of the question for America

Nationism is the answer

/thread

I was going to post a fat black woman shaving her pussy taking a shit on here but i kind of like the server so i won't

Do it

DEW IT

nah

i'll just dm it to you

Then I'll post it on here

fuck i copy pasted the debate

....

Lmao

i had the thot copied...

ffs....

Lmao

I just had a bunch of people gang up on for saying Nation states didn't work, then pointed out the sucess of apartheid south africa