The natural way of behavior of man is to trade things.

@Xinyue They don't have to operate single mindedly, I don't believe they do

First of all, no, I've never heard of this; second of all, I would like evidence; third of all, this is irrelevant - I have nothing in common with my cousins.

All of them European Jews are related

There are cultural differences between jews and other groups, as with any population

I'm not entirely surprised

<:lol:521377935672737792>

jews are generally very successful, are they not?

@The Big Oof there's of course no reason to think that they do, but lots of people are betting on them acting as single minded group

be that for whatever reason you want it to be

I dom

Read Carrol Quigley’s *tragedy and hope*, he was a *supporter* of the Anglo-American establishment and admitted all this stuff

I don't think they act of one mind

There's a lot to suggest they don't

But they do have different views

as with any group

from other people

that's all irrelevant Fresh, what matters are the arguments made and the theory presented, and how it was picked up by Lenin and the USSR and further developed etc

you honestly think you got some kind of gotcha, but no communist would care about this stuff

How were living standards in the USSR compared to the West

I'm gonna give myself meme roles

What is up fellow anarcho-communists

The USSR was created and controlled by the bankers retard. It was never intended to be a global system. It was never intended to be the final revolution. The “final revolution” is for you to *die*, along with 90% of the earth’s population

@Nikitis in historical perspective, that understands that conditions aren't products of superstructure but the base structure, and which understands that the base structure is never stagnant or that it never emanates from ideas but instead material and technical conditions, we would conclude that the question is immaterial. What the living conditions were over 30 years ago is not relevant to the stage of development in 2018.

I read that a sense of privacy didn't exist in the USSR is that true?

And living conditions were consistently rising in USSR, population was growing and the education levels were rising, etc. It was going pretty well until the era of stagnation triggered by Brezhnev's failure and then later driven to ground by Gorbachev

Why did Brezhnev fail?

Every revolutionary movement has been leading up to the final revolution, which is for you to *die*

The final revolution is technocracy and transhumanism

Revolutionary movements are environmentalistpilled

And the elites killing all of us Proles

He and the clique he represented - the Kosygin gang etc. - were ultimately bureaucratists and the stagnation stemmed from both the excessive bureaucratism and also from the fact that Kosygin introduced profit rationale to the way Soviet Union functioned. This, of course, was bad for a socialist economy that isn't meant to operate on profit logic. Socialised profit or not, its ultimately disadvantageous for socialism to adopt this.

```> Fascism is the dictatorship of the collective

Fundamentally untrue. Fascism is the dictatorship of the state and the highest tiers of the state leadership to be exact; Fascism, due to its repudiation of democracy as being unconducive to the Fascist spirit, cannot be collective dictatorship because the collective would only be able to execute a collective will as emergent through democratic institutions. Communism can be considered to be dictatorship of the collective, but not Fascism..```

A Leader/Monarch/Premier is in essence supposed to represent the collective will of the Nation, and guide the society to above all else, it's Preservation. Now that is the Ideal.

If they mess things up, all the problems they create are theres to deal with, they can't just shed responsibility after 8 years and leave.. they will have their head at the end of a stick and they are very aware of that..

It isn't ofc a utopia, there are complications with this model too.. @Xinyue

Yes but that's not a very viable "collective dictatorship". That is private dictatorship of the state leadership, in abstract argued to be collective. But not in actual fact nor in the effect.

Fascism is also gay

^

very gay

Agree

Fresh = Marxist Sage confirmed

It’s just as revolutionary as communism