all of them are unimpressive, none of them have the interest of the people at heart. Mosley comes across as the person who cares about the people the most, but even he falls short

because ur criteria for "caring" is absurd, it's to give them the means of production. to really care is to hand over the material

The fascists *claim* they love their "people" but this love is nothing but a pretense for power, there's nothing behind it. They don't want to empower their "volk" even so much as to trust them the means of production for national self-determination. Its bizarre to be honest.

And people fall for it in droves

Boggles the mind to be honest

At most there's this bizarre vague, undefinable dream of the nation "being together", which is a lot of oratorial wankery that gives the impression its talking about something meaningful while in reality its the same shit repackaged in new form and language.

Its like "Stronger Together", but with totalitarianism lmao

10/10 peak argument

Don't presume yourself worthy of entertaining, peasant.

Anyone got a good library for Marxist literature

There's nothing of substantive value to fascism. Its content is hollow, and has always been. Its all about *aesthetic,* after all, its orientation, its concerns and its objective. Its never about the *actuality* of the human condition, but always about its *aesthetic.*

I believe that Bapiro pinned one recommendations list by me

yeah its the fourth pin down

I'm a Fascist and I don't give a damn about aesthetics.

I don't talk about you

I talk about the movement as it has historically existed

It has always been about how the country or the culture *appear,* about the visions of a glorious past or a glorious future. This has always been Fascism's great selling point.

>there's nothing in the aestetics

oof

Tell me how Falange was only about aesthetics.

now that's spoken like true materialist

Falange was more substantive than, say, Italian Fascism or Nazism

Oh

It appears I have already found a great website

https://www.marxists.org/subject/index.htm

because it tried to come up with some kind of actual solution to the class conflict, but even then, it fails at the basic problem - the Control Problem, who controls the means of production and who doesn't

as Communism would have it, the Control Problem melts away

If there was one work I'd suggest for Soviet philosophy, it'd probably be *Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism,* the major work from Khrushchev era which summarises everything very well and super comprehensive way

the book is 750 pages long and *begins* with an exposition of materialism vs. idealism and nature of reality, truth and cognition

so its pretty epic

there are other great ones of course, such as the works by Spirkin, Leontev, Ilyenkov and others

Mhm

I found a Fascist library link a while ago

If anyones interested I can go find it and link it to you

care to share?

I wish the Whites won.

lame

They could have probably won

But Russia would become a rump state

Rump state?