Message from @Rex Carthaginis
Discord ID: 526044321607188481
Germany Tomorrow is a good read yeah
its a bit insubstantial in some ways, but shows a good alternative at nation-based socialism that is actual socialism instead of the faux garbage that Hitler sold the German people
Socialism is when the government does things
๐
๐
UPHOLD CENK UYGHUR THOUGHT
actually no
Cenk Uyghur thought says:
```Socialism is when government does some things, and private industry does some other things```
๐
its even dumber
Whenever you listen to an Intersectionalist talk about what would be like their metric for judging that there isn't any racial oppression, it is that Blacks and Whites are Equally paid.
I don't think they'd be against the idea that all people be paid equally as everyone is equally *deserving* just because they're here.
I love how The Young Turks is named after a nationalist political group in the Ottoman Empire yet they bash nationalism
You will always see them point out the disparity between Sexes when it comes to income.
Gender Pay Gap n all that...
intersectionality isn't really about the equal pay stuff, its the assertion first and foremost that all oppressions intersect. Which is just false from one's own experience imo
@Spookaswa ikr! ๐
i don't see why you're saying that they aren't Marxists... especially when most Marxists today whether you consider them hardcore or not, are intersectionalists.. you can't say that about for example.. Libertarians
```Armenian holocaust didn't happen, but should've```
- Chunk Uigur
Intersectionality isn't Marxian. Marxists would say that class oppression is the fundamental oppression that overrules all other possible, conceivable forms. Intersectionalists disagree with this, they treat all conceivable oppressions as equal, intersecting, interpenetrating.
Marx was thoroughly anti-intersectionalist in his world outlook, just a basic reading on Marx demonstrates this
I think they would agree with you on that races are a social construct in their entirety, we are all born equal and that we are equally deserving if it wasn't for muh capitalism.
Their assertion isn't that all oppression is equal, it's that all people in [insert category] are oppressed in the same way based on that category.. that's how they strategically dismantle Individualism.. wouldn't that be your claim about Class?
If you saw any of the arguments between Marxists and intersectional ones, you'd instantly see what I mean.
Many intersectionalists have a specific slur, used particularly against classical Marxists: **class reductionist**
Marxism = **literally class reductionism, by necessity**
and they use this word as a negative
anyway..
tell me one thing that's wrong about Armenian Genocide
it was a genocide
next
based
redpilled
```A working man has written a pamphlet against the head of the system, not against Louis-Philippe, but against โRothschild I. King of the Jewsโ. [by G. M. Dairnvaell] The success of this pamphlet (it has now gone through some twenty editions) shows how much this was an attack in the right direction. King Rothschild has been obliged to publish two defences against these attacks of a man whom nobody knows, and the whole of whose property consists in the suit of clothes he wears. The public have taken up the controversy with the greatest interest. Some thirty pamphlets have been published pro and con. The hatred against Rothschild and the money lords is enormous, and a German paper says, Rothschild might take this as a warning that he had better take up his headquarters somewhere else than upon the ever-burning volcano of Paris.```
- Engels, 1846
damn, 2woke4me
ain't this the lad that said the Family Unit would be dismantled under his system?
quite to the contrary, not dismantled, but that it would wither away
It's Christmas, get this crap out of here.
No, that was Martin Luther King, a.k.a. Hegel
๐
Family has always evolved throughout the ages, no reason to think it won't continue to evolve
yeah
just like gender
family has always evolved though
family in 2018 isn't what it was in 341