Message from @Xinyue
Discord ID: 528222462815633418
Unending skepticism and criticism has that effect regardless of whether you are correct about anything or not.
In the Soviet model, for example, there is a stratum for politically active people - the Party. But should the ruling members be elected? Yes, sure. Should there be a class of independent non-party candidates? Yes, sure. USSR observed both.
I'm right, there are many people fine with doing what they are told and that is not a flaw, that's just their role
It's just how it works
I don't think it is our place to say how we've evolved is a flaw.
I don't think any of the various temperaments or *sub species* we see in humans is a flaw
it all has it's place and a good society accommodates that
God
themselves, I'd say
God
lmao
citation needed
God is good too
Well that's how they choose to behave
It's how we're created that decides our place in the world
So like, its either themselves or God
we have different purposes, all of us.. that's why we're not given the same abilities and opportunities and interests
Not only is God unproven, but there's *literally no way to say anything about his character and views on morality,* beyond any statements of his existence
That's a deeper conversation that we will have next time ..
no religions reject god
Buddhism certainly does
._.
again, in the pure form rather than the folk form
i think we understand god in different ways
God is a non-point
certainly in politics and ethics
now in ontology there's some room for him
but in little else
nah
Turk begone
That some people believe in God in 2018 is certainly strong evidence that we're not all equal in capacity 😄
<:ShrekFedora:521390487240966145>
like I have nothing against Deism because Deism just makes statement on his existence, and refuses to make statements on his character, personality etc.
that's bearable
but the religious types
ffs
Communist fedorafag complaining about others being unbearable
<:thonk:520003926381166597>