Message from @oojimaflip

Discord ID: 680150555267694691


2020-02-20 16:28:39 UTC  

I felt legitimately sad when he interviewed that drugged out blonde girl who needed money for rent.

2020-02-20 20:22:34 UTC  

148 Wh/Kg for superconducting graphene caps

2020-02-20 20:22:39 UTC  

vs

2020-02-20 20:23:26 UTC  

2500 Wh/Kg from LiPo

2020-02-20 20:23:42 UTC  

Graphene batteries 😂

2020-02-20 20:24:02 UTC  

don't even need Thunderfoot for this one

2020-02-20 20:26:39 UTC  

bruh

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634420893870981168/680148333654048810/Screen_Shot_2020-02-20_at_3.26.24_PM.JPG

2020-02-20 20:29:47 UTC  

of?

2020-02-20 20:31:13 UTC  

of the bright future

2020-02-20 20:32:50 UTC  

idno my dude, it took like five minutes of "research" to conclude that: graphene batteries = bullshit. But I guess you just drank the koolaid

2020-02-20 20:33:41 UTC  

but if those numbers don't mean shit to you there isn't anything I can do about that

2020-02-20 20:34:06 UTC  

i am well aware they they are not as powerful

2020-02-20 20:34:10 UTC  

We can't mass produce the right kinda graphine
Graphine batteries work in theory though

2020-02-20 20:34:29 UTC  

*Flourinated*

2020-02-20 20:34:37 UTC  

bet that's a lovely process

2020-02-20 20:35:06 UTC  

we'll never be able to mass produce graphite if we don't produce it at all

2020-02-20 20:35:22 UTC  

we have to produce it for something

2020-02-20 20:35:28 UTC  

we do?

2020-02-20 20:35:34 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2020-02-20 20:35:37 UTC  

ok then

2020-02-20 20:36:08 UTC  

maybe we use materials where they are best suited?

2020-02-20 20:36:35 UTC  

so, like, diesel and petrol for powering our cars

2020-02-20 20:36:49 UTC  

or maybe move to hydrogen fuel cells

2020-02-20 20:36:53 UTC  

but batteries?

2020-02-20 20:37:19 UTC  

nah. I'll pass. retard tier idea

2020-02-20 20:38:12 UTC  

you can make the same argument for hydrogen.
bad energy density, and it dissolves into a metal under pressure.

2020-02-20 20:39:00 UTC  

etc etc

2020-02-20 20:39:38 UTC  

imagine thinking 39,405 Wh/Kg is bad energy density 😂

2020-02-20 20:39:54 UTC  

bad in comparison to gasoline

2020-02-20 20:40:08 UTC  

umm, do you know what you're talking about?

2020-02-20 20:40:22 UTC  

not always

2020-02-20 20:40:32 UTC  

pro tip: not here

2020-02-20 20:40:38 UTC  

but it doesn't stop me

2020-02-20 20:41:12 UTC  

hydrogen specific energy density is way higher than gasoline

2020-02-20 20:41:51 UTC  

hence the extremely explodey nature of the stuff

2020-02-20 20:43:06 UTC  

i'm thinking of something else then

2020-02-20 20:43:31 UTC  

i know it has something lower than gasoline

2020-02-20 20:44:01 UTC  

hold up