Message from @Wan6Saber
Discord ID: 678381899588304918
Ruling for the people is an aesthetic. You're functionally the same as a monarch.
no not an aesthetic, an ethic
Enlightened despotism is just reskinned despotism
I agree
with it, you open yourself up to greater powers, but also greater moral vulnerabilities
it's despotism plus the people are too educated to fuck over
too greatly
I have pot roast to eat <:yay:638817157840502815>
nice
No, dictators claim to rule for the people. Just as monarchs can choose to be either benevolent or despotic, dictators also have that choice.
There isn't a moral or ethical vulnerability, but there is a vulnerability to being couped, since your house isn't sacred.
The monarch is the person, not a position, basically.
In Europe the monarchs just pivoted
From divine right to enlightened despot
Bloomberg Wants Clinton | TPS #673. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlDTpfnSqH8
You fell for the Jews trap to gain media attention
the downvotes are coming in heavy from the start
Holy fuck the intro to Gettysburg is ten minutes long
Mandate of Heaven > Divine Right of Rule
They’re the same thing ones just Chinese culture
They’re different by virtue that one is just Chinese
Welcome to my youtube hell
And has slightly different mechanics
I've never been more tempted to install/activate adblock than I am right now
different in how they replace their rulers
what meds do they give people with imposter syndrome?
You might as well say Chinese divine right to rule>European
that could explain a lot of the affirmative action lefts crazyness
bloomberg is everywhere
As in Chinese are dickless and abandon their leader as soon as something goes wrong
more like they're dickheads
I'm tempted to join the Democrat party, and run my own presidental campaign just to fuck with him
that shit on their old leader(s)
Dickless
Bloomberg for 145
Euros were dickless
or what ever is the actual Clinton death count
6000000
The Chinese had way more balls than their European counterparts