Goodnight fellas,

gn o/

night night

gn brah

In a sense doesn't any definition become meaningless without a rigorously axiomatic foundation

god bless

<:comfy:639985510785351680>

i.e. prove the unprovable

Octo needs to study Cauchy sequences

You will lose all faith in real numbers

im tripping out rn wheeee

well the dudes that tried to form rigorously axiomatic foundations ultimately failed because its ALL contextual

Nobody:

but the point is

this is a repeat of the molly meme debates

the way we construct real numbers is absurd

we still have preferences

Sleepy Hitler:

pointless mouth poopoo

i like how fast this chat's moving

<:comfy:639985510785351680>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_sequence

are you all foreign or ethnic?

Everyone here is Zimbabwean

oh based

This is how we define real numbers

a limit of an infinite converging series

We were hired by the cia to trap wignats

> what is really a number

simple

<:big_brained:396156349676781569>

numbers are PHYSICAL OBJECTS

@fuguer I've seen this before. It's another way to prove that limits exist for a function iirc

Monotonic

nope can't be defined

what is the smallest part of the human body

<:dab:395562678153904128>

the soul

We represent physical objects with numbers