Message from @booshi
Discord ID: 679555151249276938
<:dab:395562678153904128>
No,... One example would be we think its moral to allow unlimited breeding but this this leads to infinite misery in the future
We can't agree on a common optimization criteria for moral systems
Hence all are absurd
Should you optimize for the wellbeing of yourself? Those alive today? Those who will be alive?
No
Unless you can rigorously define it, it's meaningless
lol we disagree on how many kids ppl need
everything is LIE
<:impotentrage:552803856535257090>
basically yes
WE DISAGREEE
if you follow it to its logical conclusion
without an axiomatic foundation morality falls apart and becomes absurd
depends on what you mean by morality lol
these words!!!
⏳
beyond my comprehension
Not sure though
fuck you im right
Goodnight fellas,
gn o/
night night
gn brah
In a sense doesn't any definition become meaningless without a rigorously axiomatic foundation
god bless
<:comfy:639985510785351680>
i.e. prove the unprovable
Octo needs to study Cauchy sequences
You will lose all faith in real numbers
im tripping out rn wheeee
well the dudes that tried to form rigorously axiomatic foundations ultimately failed because its ALL contextual
Nobody:
but the point is
this is a repeat of the molly meme debates
the way we construct real numbers is absurd
we still have preferences