Message from @fuguer

Discord ID: 681210186467508235


2020-02-23 18:43:31 UTC  

yes we can

2020-02-23 18:43:42 UTC  

we can 100% predict the evolution of a quantum wavefunction

2020-02-23 18:43:52 UTC  

we can predict the orbital mechanics

2020-02-23 18:43:56 UTC  

that's predicting the future

2020-02-23 18:43:59 UTC  

Where’s the unified theory

2020-02-23 18:44:38 UTC  

Not to mention the amount of calculating power to do so would be beyond the physical limits of reality

2020-02-23 18:44:43 UTC  

we don't get a unified theory until we create a background independent version of quantum mechanics

2020-02-23 18:44:47 UTC  

we need the memeified theory

2020-02-23 18:44:55 UTC  

that's what string theory is trying to do

2020-02-23 18:45:02 UTC  

Give me the unified theory first

2020-02-23 18:45:15 UTC  

Then give me the universe’s most powerful forecasting computer

2020-02-23 18:45:23 UTC  

And a lot of electricity

2020-02-23 18:45:29 UTC  

I thought assault weapons are already banned.

2020-02-23 18:45:32 UTC  

obviously with a perfect theory you could predict a lot of the future, but even then you cant predict all of it

2020-02-23 18:45:40 UTC  

does a unified theory even translate into perfect knowledge of all systems

2020-02-23 18:45:42 UTC  

So about 10^10 Dyson spheres

2020-02-23 18:45:50 UTC  

no Nerth because there are multiple timelines

2020-02-23 18:45:55 UTC  

you dont know which timeline you will end up in

2020-02-23 18:46:01 UTC  

does finishing physics allow you to perfectly understand all processes within biology

2020-02-23 18:46:04 UTC  

such as when you measure spin, its completely random

2020-02-23 18:46:04 UTC  

Is Bernie going to team up with Beto to come take your AR-15?

2020-02-23 18:46:09 UTC  

Give me 10^10 Dyson spheres

2020-02-23 18:46:13 UTC  

Bernie/Beto 2020

2020-02-23 18:46:14 UTC  

Bells Theorem proves its not a result of hidden variables

2020-02-23 18:46:15 UTC  

Please

2020-02-23 18:46:34 UTC  

We thank you for your Dyson spheres order. It should be shipped shortly.

2020-02-23 18:46:43 UTC  

I can annihilate a hole in the side of reality and create the ethnostate inside the hole

2020-02-23 18:46:50 UTC  

spin is a special ability in JoJo

2020-02-23 18:47:01 UTC  

JoJo = homosexual

2020-02-23 18:47:07 UTC  

no

2020-02-23 18:47:11 UTC  

no

2020-02-23 18:47:12 UTC  

its straight

2020-02-23 18:47:36 UTC  

The thing is, time is really interesting. its literally true that the present is defined as a boundary condition between past and future. we think only the past is fixed, but its not true, the future is fixed as well

2020-02-23 18:47:51 UTC  

In the future a kid will be able to order a Dyson sphere for a science project

2020-02-23 18:48:27 UTC  

This is what im talking about, not some pseudo-science crackpot shit

2020-02-23 18:48:40 UTC  

The two-state vector formalism is one example of a time-symmetric interpretation of quantum mechanics (see Interpretations of quantum mechanics). Time-symmetric interpretations of quantum mechanics were first suggested by Walter Schottky in 1921,[1] and later by several other scientists. The two-state vector formalism was first developed by Satosi Watanabe[2] in 1955, who named it the Double Inferential state-Vector Formalism (DIVF). Watanabe proposed that information given by forwards evolving quantum states is not complete; rather, both forwards and backwards evolving quantum states are required to describe a quantum state: a first state vector that evolves from the initial conditions towards the future, and a second state vector that evolves backwards in time from future boundary conditions. Past and future measurements, taken together, provide complete information about a quantum system. Watanabe's work was later rediscovered by Yakir Aharonov, Peter Bergmann and Joel Lebowitz in 1964, who later renamed it the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF).[3] Conventional prediction, as well as retrodiction, can be obtained formally by separating out the initial conditions (or, conversely, the final conditions) by performing sequences of coherence-destroying operations, thereby cancelling out the influence of the two state vectors.

2020-02-23 18:49:04 UTC  

*Watanabe proposed that information given by forwards evolving quantum states is not complete; rather, both forwards and backwards evolving quantum states are required to describe a quantum state: a first state vector that evolves from the initial conditions towards the future, and a second state vector that evolves backwards in time from future boundary conditions. Past and future measurements, taken together, provide complete information about a quantum system.*

2020-02-23 18:49:10 UTC  

What’s the most energy producing fictional object