Message from @fuguer
Discord ID: 681210186467508235
yes we can
we can 100% predict the evolution of a quantum wavefunction
we can predict the orbital mechanics
that's predicting the future
Where’s the unified theory
Not to mention the amount of calculating power to do so would be beyond the physical limits of reality
we don't get a unified theory until we create a background independent version of quantum mechanics
we need the memeified theory
that's what string theory is trying to do
Give me the unified theory first
Then give me the universe’s most powerful forecasting computer
And a lot of electricity
I thought assault weapons are already banned.
obviously with a perfect theory you could predict a lot of the future, but even then you cant predict all of it
does a unified theory even translate into perfect knowledge of all systems
So about 10^10 Dyson spheres
no Nerth because there are multiple timelines
you dont know which timeline you will end up in
does finishing physics allow you to perfectly understand all processes within biology
Is Bernie going to team up with Beto to come take your AR-15?
Give me 10^10 Dyson spheres
Bernie/Beto 2020
Bells Theorem proves its not a result of hidden variables
Please
We thank you for your Dyson spheres order. It should be shipped shortly.
I can annihilate a hole in the side of reality and create the ethnostate inside the hole
spin is a special ability in JoJo
JoJo = homosexual
no
no
its straight
The thing is, time is really interesting. its literally true that the present is defined as a boundary condition between past and future. we think only the past is fixed, but its not true, the future is fixed as well
In the future a kid will be able to order a Dyson sphere for a science project
This is what im talking about, not some pseudo-science crackpot shit
The two-state vector formalism is one example of a time-symmetric interpretation of quantum mechanics (see Interpretations of quantum mechanics). Time-symmetric interpretations of quantum mechanics were first suggested by Walter Schottky in 1921,[1] and later by several other scientists. The two-state vector formalism was first developed by Satosi Watanabe[2] in 1955, who named it the Double Inferential state-Vector Formalism (DIVF). Watanabe proposed that information given by forwards evolving quantum states is not complete; rather, both forwards and backwards evolving quantum states are required to describe a quantum state: a first state vector that evolves from the initial conditions towards the future, and a second state vector that evolves backwards in time from future boundary conditions. Past and future measurements, taken together, provide complete information about a quantum system. Watanabe's work was later rediscovered by Yakir Aharonov, Peter Bergmann and Joel Lebowitz in 1964, who later renamed it the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF).[3] Conventional prediction, as well as retrodiction, can be obtained formally by separating out the initial conditions (or, conversely, the final conditions) by performing sequences of coherence-destroying operations, thereby cancelling out the influence of the two state vectors.
*Watanabe proposed that information given by forwards evolving quantum states is not complete; rather, both forwards and backwards evolving quantum states are required to describe a quantum state: a first state vector that evolves from the initial conditions towards the future, and a second state vector that evolves backwards in time from future boundary conditions. Past and future measurements, taken together, provide complete information about a quantum system.*
What’s the most energy producing fictional object