Message from @blanc
Discord ID: 687904065652523173
as to whether it was more or less common in places other than the aristocracy
that's a difficult question
I have zero doubt that there were pedophile millionaires and elites
hehe copied your text
we have reports from the military
I suspect I'd be more enthusiastic about economic production if I could literally buy women at a market
I think we place too much stock in what academia says about this. It is usually the opposite in critical arguments like this.
we don't have to look at academia we can just look at what they themselves said
ahh imagine people in year 3000 discussing how what weinstein and epstein did was acceptable cause these always got away with it
Ask yourself. If any historian or archeologist found empirical evidence to the contrary, what do you think would happen to them?
in some random forum of autists
like acceptable in this here time 😎
I think they would write a book about it probably
@Nerthulas how do we know it was them who said it?
maybe among pedophiliac elites
and they buy sissies at a premium
and maybe Bill Clinton himself
@Nerthulas Every physical artifact we have says nothing about it. Parchment could be a forgery
@Nerthulas you gotta go consuls or the five good emperors bro, otherwise their histories are doubtful and tainted
ok so, idk to what extent original manuscripts exist - I know there are some preserved papyrus scrolls which people use to corroborate other reports - I know that there is extensive transmission from multiple sources including western monks, the byzantine libraries, and arab copies
so
its literally thousands of years ago.
about pedophile nobles and rich people
if you want to say that the arabs, the monks, and the byzantines were all conspiring to change it in the same way...
then
yeah things are better thankfully
ok, you have a conspiracy theory
I don't buy it lol
about what
lolita express is a hoax?
ahh you mean the tainting
nono it goes beyond that
ayyylmao says that the byzantines, the arabs, and the monks all conspired to change the manuscripts in the same way
Imagine them reading a thousand years that we voted for an orange cheeto and he fucked us.
Do you think that is accurate?
so now you're just casting doubt about the views of the authors
Roman historians themselves wrote shit and lies on emperors. Rich people hated them
Or that we voted for a mushroom penis man
well, it's not based on one author, and we don't have to base it on their opinions