Message from @blanc

Discord ID: 687903318244327560


2020-03-13 05:59:27 UTC  

@Nerthulas LMAO case in point, romans thought homo sex was akin to extravagance, excess, degeneration and decline

2020-03-13 05:59:37 UTC  

some did, but they still did it lmao

2020-03-13 05:59:41 UTC  

you didn't think this through bro

2020-03-13 05:59:44 UTC  

brah

2020-03-13 05:59:50 UTC  

him calling it extravagant

2020-03-13 05:59:53 UTC  

in victorian england there were prostitutes

2020-03-13 05:59:57 UTC  

means there was something to call extravagant

2020-03-13 06:00:13 UTC  

I have zero doubt that there were anti-gay people

2020-03-13 06:00:37 UTC  

@blanc you mean sex worker. didnt we just have womens day?

2020-03-13 06:00:47 UTC  

it was only widely accepted, if at all, in the upper classes during the decline

2020-03-13 06:01:02 UTC  

Victorian England was the pinnacle of Western culture

2020-03-13 06:01:09 UTC  

It's been downhill since then

2020-03-13 06:01:11 UTC  

(((upper classes)))

2020-03-13 06:01:14 UTC  

oh also extravagance goes against basic Roman virtues

2020-03-13 06:01:21 UTC  

it wasnt a conpliment

2020-03-13 06:01:28 UTC  

I didn't say it was

2020-03-13 06:01:45 UTC  

one author we've seen didn't like that some people were overpaying for slave boys

2020-03-13 06:01:48 UTC  

in a certain period

2020-03-13 06:02:02 UTC  

as to whether it was more or less common in places other than the aristocracy

2020-03-13 06:02:08 UTC  

that's a difficult question

2020-03-13 06:02:11 UTC  

I have zero doubt that there were pedophile millionaires and elites

2020-03-13 06:02:18 UTC  

hehe copied your text

2020-03-13 06:02:19 UTC  

we have reports from the military

2020-03-13 06:02:22 UTC  

I suspect I'd be more enthusiastic about economic production if I could literally buy women at a market

2020-03-13 06:02:23 UTC  

I think we place too much stock in what academia says about this. It is usually the opposite in critical arguments like this.

2020-03-13 06:03:09 UTC  

we don't have to look at academia we can just look at what they themselves said

2020-03-13 06:03:15 UTC  

ahh imagine people in year 3000 discussing how what weinstein and epstein did was acceptable cause these always got away with it

2020-03-13 06:03:21 UTC  

Ask yourself. If any historian or archeologist found empirical evidence to the contrary, what do you think would happen to them?

2020-03-13 06:03:22 UTC  

in some random forum of autists

2020-03-13 06:03:39 UTC  

like acceptable in this here time 😎

2020-03-13 06:03:39 UTC  

I think they would write a book about it probably

2020-03-13 06:03:50 UTC  

@Nerthulas how do we know it was them who said it?

2020-03-13 06:03:53 UTC  

maybe among pedophiliac elites

2020-03-13 06:03:59 UTC  

@blanc Roman Emperors kept male slaves

2020-03-13 06:04:01 UTC  

and they buy sissies at a premium

2020-03-13 06:04:09 UTC  

and maybe Bill Clinton himself

2020-03-13 06:04:37 UTC  

@Nerthulas Every physical artifact we have says nothing about it. Parchment could be a forgery

2020-03-13 06:04:46 UTC  

@Nerthulas you gotta go consuls or the five good emperors bro, otherwise their histories are doubtful and tainted

2020-03-13 06:05:09 UTC  

senators hated the new imperial system

2020-03-13 06:05:12 UTC  

ok so, idk to what extent original manuscripts exist - I know there are some preserved papyrus scrolls which people use to corroborate other reports - I know that there is extensive transmission from multiple sources including western monks, the byzantine libraries, and arab copies

2020-03-13 06:05:24 UTC  

so