I'm wondering if you're consistent

not me

if you want to get a witch doctor to do a rain dance around her,
that also won't interfere with the chemo

I didn't say I didn't trust it

I'm just wondering why you do

@Nerthulas If I was consistent would you agree with me more?

idk

So why is it even being discussed?

it would make me think you had your shit together more

lol

basado y redpiliado @MARS3.0

rojopastillado*

@Nerthulas I think its just a cope on your end.

rojopastillado es verdad

ok

how so?

mala mía

I think my question is legitimate

traicione a la hispanidad <:why:638779720015675405>

@Nerthulas Do you think wooden doors are gas tight?

<:why:638779720015675405>

if your position is that historians should not be trusted, why are you using a graph made a few years ago talking about exact death counts from 600 years ago

"Genocide of the Jews" lol

I have no idea whether doors are or are not gas-tight

maybe some are and some aren't I don't know

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8112063/America-braces-coronvirus-collapse-100-00-ICU-beds-10-MILLION-hospitalized.html

I know that when I'm in a room with smoke, the doors can be wooden and there is still a dangerous amount of smoke...

@Nerthulas If wooden doors are not gas tight and historically they are seen to be in a peer reviewed academic system, can we accept anything else they say?

what?

consistency is important to you?

you can suffocate in a room with no door

well a person is not 'they'

also

there are mistakes made in peer reviewed systems of other fields

very famous ones

It would make me thing you have your shit together more if you were more consistent in your wooden door gas tight argument.

I'm not putting some kind of great stake in the peer review system, I'm not gonna defend the peer-review system here

I think you're trolling