but which ones?

well let me show you one that is a little more recent than medieval https://www.olivercromwell.org/jews.htm

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/359437383805960192/688516951479549992/Bosanska_Artilerija_1.mp4

so where did they rewrite history

I looked up this man Menasseh ben Israel

@Nerthulas There is only one question you need to ask whether history has been subverted. Is there a strategic advantage to subverting history? Yes there is. Why would it not be subverted if the occupiers of Europe stand to gain from it strategically?

his writings were theological and magical, not historical

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve?/Judaism

@gast the world was much more decentralized in the medieval period

so the idea that historians and transcribers everywhere were conspiring to paint the same picture of history seems unlikely

It was far easier to alter history as the counter viewpoints were just killed.

the idea that this was orchestrated by the jews, who would (broadly) have been a group which the westerns, byzantines, and arabs had some animosity towards, is even more unlikely

@Nerthulas naive

so where were the jews doing this?

altering history?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_of_Norwich

are were back at the topic from earlier today stretch xD

and what am I to draw from this?

This was suppressed by the Catholic clergy. Documented

it was documented by the catholic clergy as well

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8112169/Hundreds-Hindus-hold-cow-urine-drinking-party-belief-fight-coronavirus.html

***Superpower 2020***

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_of_Monmouth

Warski still going?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWuRPjJqEhY

@Rody Le Cid He gotta keep the money rolling in, weed doesn't just grow on trees you know

no, it grows under them

"the growing suspicion of collusion between the ruling class and Jews "

warski just said
"I love the jews, I want to marry a jewish woman" 😄

unironically

Will you keep this opinion in the 4th Reich?

Lets find out

guys we're obsessed with race

is that a threat?

It is a point of showing that you trust academia. Trust history and their narrative and refuse to question it.

you are simultaneously arguing for complete skepticism towards history, while providing evidence from a paragraph from a wikipedia article

I don't even doubt that there's a good reason to think that the people were concerned about jewish collusion with the ruling class

but this is not sufficient for anybody to accept that all of medieval history across the west was rewritten on the order of the jews

I don't refuse to question it

I don't have any valid points. History is correct. My argument is defeated. Finally we can go back to trusting exactly what academia says.