Message from @TheSanguineMind

Discord ID: 682389639977500684


2020-02-27 00:41:45 UTC  

In my own view of the argument at least

2020-02-27 00:42:05 UTC  

mcnn what is that

2020-02-27 00:42:22 UTC  

Matt Christianson news network

2020-02-27 00:42:41 UTC  

beijing

2020-02-27 00:43:14 UTC  

Yeah, it’s the bit some people are doing for the call in Show

2020-02-27 00:43:50 UTC  

oh i see

2020-02-27 00:43:51 UTC  

neat

2020-02-27 00:45:33 UTC  

@TheSanguineMind I don't normally do this in text chat cause it takes awhile but I would say a fetus isn't human. And what is valued is a conscious experience. which what that is would have to be argued. along with a responce to your question would be that the conscious experience of a animal would be existant but a fetus doesn't have one

2020-02-27 00:46:57 UTC  

****He doesn't like to argue over text because he can't use google while he's typing his responses.***

2020-02-27 00:47:22 UTC  

@Catboi arguable you could spend a lot more time googling over text chat convos

2020-02-27 00:48:08 UTC  

>ohh something I can argue about even though I know the point of what he's saying

2020-02-27 00:48:17 UTC  

Waow, never seen you behave like this before

2020-02-27 00:49:53 UTC  

> but I would say a fetus isn't human
@Fondboy imagine my surprise

2020-02-27 00:50:11 UTC  

Fetus not worth saving, but cows, that's murder

2020-02-27 00:50:13 UTC  

🤔

2020-02-27 00:50:24 UTC  

>Dat's not me dats the _experts!_

2020-02-27 00:51:05 UTC  

>not human
Lol. First time I've heard that smooth brain take.

2020-02-27 00:51:30 UTC  

He thinks all animals have "consciousness" because a vegan told him so

2020-02-27 00:51:43 UTC  

what a surprise he doesn't see the difference of kind

2020-02-27 00:52:09 UTC  

@Unironic Ohio Supremecist I don't think the pro choice position is posible if you grant yes it is a human

2020-02-27 00:52:48 UTC  

@Fondboy that goes into the argument of scope and data of studies. I concede that you have your reasons to believe what you believe, and I have mine

2020-02-27 00:52:59 UTC  

🤣

2020-02-27 00:53:13 UTC  

> I don't think the pro choice position is posible if you grant yes it is a human
@Fondboy so, you need to disregard reality to be pro-abortion

2020-02-27 00:53:38 UTC  

That's almost as bad as the stuff I mock fondboy for saying @TheSanguineMind

2020-02-27 00:53:40 UTC  

@Dan V there isn't an objective measure to what is life buddy

2020-02-27 00:53:48 UTC  

>You do you, speak you're truth, you're entitled to your opinion

2020-02-27 00:53:53 UTC  

>nobody can take it away from you

2020-02-27 00:54:01 UTC  

life and human are not the same thing

2020-02-27 00:54:07 UTC  

a bee is alive. a bee is not human

2020-02-27 00:54:09 UTC  

There's no objective measure to what is life

2020-02-27 00:54:13 UTC  

therefore Fondjew isn't alive

2020-02-27 00:54:16 UTC  

and we can cull him

2020-02-27 00:54:19 UTC  

based

2020-02-27 00:54:31 UTC  

don't scientist still disagree on if a virus is a life

2020-02-27 00:54:35 UTC  

@Catboi lol, sorry. I just choose my battles. I think he is extremely wrong, but I’m not equipped to change his mind

2020-02-27 00:54:51 UTC  

@Fondboy
Agreed.
But denying obvious scientific reality to post facto justify your position is pretty smooth brained.

2020-02-27 00:54:52 UTC  

>lets compared single cell life and more abstract basic definitiions to obscure the conversation

2020-02-27 00:54:56 UTC  

this is why I call you fondjew

2020-02-27 00:55:00 UTC  

You know what the context is

2020-02-27 00:55:22 UTC  

and your response is to talk about the exact other end of the scale from Eukaryotic life

2020-02-27 00:55:24 UTC  

> @Dan V there isn't an objective measure to what is life buddy
@Fondboy
That is empirically incorrect.