@Romans 6 I'm starting in on the PDF. The definitions of Zionism you give aren't the only positions people can take, but they are useful. I didn't realize English was your second language. The first page took me a bit to get through. This document needs some strong proofreading in order to make it smooth. For example, when the definitions are written in first person after your introduction is in first person, it doesn't strike the reader as a definition. Instead, the reader will mistake it for being your position until they get to the second definition. Objective writing will help. There are those who believe Israel can exist as a state, but it isn't the same as Zionism. Also, your definitions have everything to do with basic politics. The supposed Zionism I don't see here is the "Global conspiracy for Jews to rule from Israel" type that some people worry about. I'll have time later to get further into the document after I eat and come back from a class. Maybe that stuff is down further. 😃 Thanks for the effort. I'm leaving your document open on my computer while I go to class. (I'm not a college student. It's a gym class.)

LOl exactly that type dont exist

Did I interrupt a spat?

I had to make an edit!!! Sorry

its a fantasy

Ok, I'll understand better when I finish reading it.

And ofc it has everything to do with politic what are we talking about here if not politics, that is were the meat is!!

that is why some people must die ( accoding to soros)

why some countries must rise and some must fall.

and you right people can take many positions, but I pick the one most taken by the most powerfull people

CIA + Military Infiltrate Major Media Networks - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13AXzbmGy9c

thats the poinst right to focus on the powerfull, you wont find any powerful jew anywhere who doest fit into one of the three catagories

oh my fav. Helium dioxide (reporter)

yukk

or powerful non jew for that matter since non jews can be Zionist too

@Gary If you mean a spat between SniperLyfe and me, no. I had said something earlier about being careful not to mislabel the SPLC as pro-jew, responding to someone else's video post. I babbled a bit about lumping all Jews into various conspiracy theories, as opposed to facts. So, while I was napping, SniperLyfe gave me his reading material 😃 If you mean some other stupidity that was going on earlier, that stuff was lame. Someone started name-calling SL with no basis. SL keeps posting, so I gotta rewind and read before I leave for class. Nighty night, guys.

TTYL

I uplaoded wrong one lol pre proof read, but you get the idea

@Romans 6 "And ofc it has everything to do with politic" I meant basic, non-conspiracy politics, but I understand your reply anyway.

th point is simple, different people at the top who support Israel whether jew or non jew have different opinions about how that Israel should look

some of those people are your enemies like Soros, they are Form 3 typically and some are not like Ben shapiro is is form 1

and as to conspiracy point, ofc they are all conspiracies, a conspiracy is just more then one person conspiring with another to achieve a certain aim , each form has its own conspiracy of people, you and me here conspiring to reveal truth this is conspiracy , the question is , is tit good for us or bad? and who is winning? right now its obv the Soros army is dominant , and yes that a very big problem

and many evil Zionsts will think so too as I lay out in the document includin myself and most of this country

still some spell checks but more readable

@Romans 6 Got the new PDF file. Thank you. Some of your posts are a little tough. Their brevity helps. Don't follow the common on-line form of putting commas where periods belong and omitting all other commas.

* posts = here on discord, not in the document.

np, no one really challenge me on this doc yet and i post last week, so interested to hear or maybe learn somthing new,

What is your first language?

but I would need to see some heavy evidence cuz i done a lot of diggin lol

Woah! Look at the time! I got more reading done, but now I gotta go! Class in 15 mins.

np seya later

I wait for your analysis then

Steg work

@Romans 6 why does George Soros own voting machines? I’m from Aus and I just find this unbelievable that these machines are privately owned? How can be?

He does

I believe he owned a company or stocks in that company

Sort of like one of the Bush brothers having something to do with the clean up company that did the clean up after 9/11

@BlackDouglas surely Q is looking at this closely?

Looking at all things closely

It all fits into a puzzle that tells the bigger story.

On Soros and voting machines: Let's remember how people work in general. Soros owns or has a large shareholding stake in certain companies. The voting machines are somewhere down the tree from there. If you want them manipulated, you can't just tell everyone in the company/-ies. You need people who are like-minded, and they have to implement it in a way that is not easily detected by others in the company. It's not as if Soros himself talks to every employee and they're all in on "it." When we talk in ways that sound like every employee would be in on "it," that puts up barriers and prevents red-pilling others. Also, we can't believe something just because we like it along the lines of "our team." For example, some don't want to believe the recent allegations against Roy Moore, but are willing to swiftly willing to believe the teenager-affair-abortion allegations against Sheriff Israel. We have to keep the same standard for people on both sides. If we jump at whatever we favor in the name of good-guy/bad-guy my-team versus them without questioning the sources of these rumours, then we loose all credibility and, again, prevent people from believing us. Use good language skills, a touch of skepticism, and put pieces of evidence together in coherent fashion RATHER than leaping to a conclusion, and your blue-pill or neutral audience will respect your information better.