Message from @Nichts
Discord ID: 671827759823061038
Presumably because it's over your head.
or has the mental development of a rebellious teenager
Sure.
hey lolo have you ever lived in a country under communist regime
You do use a lot of fancy words which tends to reduce the value of discussion
wrong. That improves the discussion.
Playing dumb isn't an improvement on anything.
Yeah, but there's a time and a place
Looks like you used a thesaurus to stick random long words in at places
Not anywhere as dumb as anarcho communism though
If this isn't the time and place for legitimate discussions of politics and relevant terms, then I will show myself the door.
@lolo hey lolo have you ever lived in a country under communist regime
You cannot "dumb down" complex concepts. As I said already, that abridges the meaning and reduces meaningful contemplation to an exercise in calculation/description.
Marcuse has some great chapters on this, if anyone is interested.
You cannot dumb down complex concepts. This hurts the meaning and reduces discussion to mere description. That would be a more clear way to say it.
Dumb people use words like that for self aggrandizement
"hurts" =/= abridge.
discussion =/= contemplation
If the collective reading level here is middle school, then sure.
You can keep having dumb discussions. I'll leave.
if then, you are equivalent to an infant in ITS crib
all commumists are
Sure, there are minor linguistic differences but the basic meaning is the same.
The purpose of language is communication
G O N E
@lolo sorry but its pretty clear you dont actually want to have a conversation, you just wanna talk down to "bad people"
invalid user lmfao accurate
Gotta love them navel gazers
lolo is clearly a racist child. You have to be one to be antideutsche. It's embedded in both the theory and the praxis.
Also ancaps are as hilarious as Maoists. Just a friendly but entirely deserved drive by.
The way I see it communism can't and doesn't work. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" generally removes any kind of personal incentive to work hard. When you're compensated roughly the same regardless of how much you produce why would you ever put in any effort?
I suspect this is why many communist states have been dictatorships, as when you remove people's incentives you need the government to step in and make sure people are actually doing things. If the people's paradise doesn't motivate you enough to work hard? Maybe the gulag will.
And even so, people will work hard enough to not be thrown in a prison camp and thus receive just enough to barely survive.
Okay that's just a grotesque overcorrection of reality.
nah
Nobody gives a shit? True. Everyone is barely scraping by? Lol.
Really depends on way too many things.
No, as the options are limited for the worker to sell his labour to(in case of communism, there's only one buyer of their labour)
The remuneration WILL be lower.