I'm not fully a National Bolshevik because they are for direct democracy

Communist Russia practiced a different from of Capitalism same as China you can cope with it being "planned economy"

but effectively speaking

they were

I like the Soviet style of goverment more

Plus

anyone that has any idea of what Marx wrote knows that Marx's advocation is what we do when we reach post-scarcity

the USSR had nothing similar to the PRC

until Brezhnev came

and made everything revisionism

Krushchev too

I'd say China under Mao was definitely some sort of communist too

China was peak revisionism from the start

https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-7/cpml-ussr.htm read it from your own ideological brothers

Even if state capitalism best describes Soviet society, and this still seems most reasonable, the Soviet Union is, in a sense, a new type of social formation. This means there is a lot of theoretical work to be done, and we can’t wait for someone else to do it for us. But we cannot stop struggling against Soviet expansion until we figure everything out. Soviet expansion itself confirms the assessment that the USSR is a class and exploitative society which the Soviet people must overthrow.

youre describing Krushchev+ USSR

I'm talking about Lenin-Stalin era

and you literally got that from some Hoxhaist

the biggest retards on the planet

More than ancaps?

ancaps at least believe in a system

>comparing war economy to standard economic systems

that's a huge fail if you are really trying to do that

Stalin had the same economic system well into the 1950s

and for some time before cornmans reforms the system still stayed

War economy is always centralized either directly or indirectly

also

that's weird because the economy of soviet union was better post stalinism :^)

actually no

its like saying the US economy improved

but people are still homeless in the US

now more then ever

in a precentige value too

even tho the GDP is higher

and what timespan are you talking about in the US

because "there are more homless now than ever" is really vague if you notice that population growth can affect all that as well

1950-2018

yea compare the amount of people in the 50s and then in 2018