Message from @Nicholas

Discord ID: 532560033486077955


2019-01-09 13:29:08 UTC  

Damn.... A lot of Christians are well....

2019-01-09 13:29:12 UTC  

Let's just sag

2019-01-09 13:29:17 UTC  

"Confused"

2019-01-09 13:29:39 UTC  

Anyone can interpret the bible, but it does not mean they are right

2019-01-09 13:29:57 UTC  

That is why sola scriptura is untenable

2019-01-09 13:30:02 UTC  

And anyone can interpret the quran. But the most authentic is Tafsir Ibn kathir

2019-01-09 13:30:08 UTC  

And qurtubi

2019-01-09 13:30:10 UTC  

Brb gotta pray

2019-01-09 13:30:29 UTC  

Only the pope can interpret the Bible, because Christ has given him authority to do so.

2019-01-09 13:30:35 UTC  

We are nothing but mere lay people

2019-01-09 13:31:29 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/395406157998456834/532551991184850974/dekbrgh27hxy.jpg

2019-01-09 13:39:14 UTC  

@Deleted User didn't St. Paul interpret the bible

2019-01-09 13:41:00 UTC  

He as a bishop interpreted the bible according to how all of the other Apostles understood it. There were disagreements, such as on works of the Mosaic Law, but for the most part, all of the Apostles agreed upon their interpretation of scripture. Just as how today the Bishops and the Magisterium agree upon how scripture ought to be understood, and how they should settle the matter.

2019-01-09 13:41:49 UTC  

All of the Apostles? As in, Paul met all of Them?

2019-01-09 13:42:03 UTC  

Ok

2019-01-09 13:42:43 UTC  

I can't remember if it was all of them, but I know that the Apostles convened at the Council of Jerusalem, which can be found in the book of Acts.

2019-01-09 13:43:03 UTC  

Peter and Paul disagreed upon what was required for salvation.

2019-01-09 13:43:07 UTC  

And they preached in Jerusalem right after St. Paul had the Vision?

2019-01-09 13:43:16 UTC  

But, the matter was settled as we read

2019-01-09 13:43:21 UTC  

Ok

2019-01-09 14:03:38 UTC  
2019-01-09 14:03:45 UTC  

It's essence

2019-01-09 14:04:06 UTC  

Read the Athanasian Creed

2019-01-09 14:06:58 UTC  

The diffrence between Orthodox and Catholics is that they make a distinction between essence and energies.

2019-01-09 14:07:01 UTC  

"The parallelism of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit is not unique to Matthew’s Gospel, but appears elsewhere in the New Testament (e.g., 2 Cor. 13:14, Heb. 9:14), as well as in the writings of the earliest Christians, who clearly understood them in the sense that we do today—that the Father, the Son, and the Spirit are three divine persons who are one divine being (God)."

2019-01-09 14:07:49 UTC  

Yes, they are one being which means they have the same essence!

2019-01-09 14:08:08 UTC  

That's that I mean

2019-01-09 14:08:37 UTC  

Ok then, thanks for specifying. We still recognize the Trinity as one in being, though.

2019-01-09 14:09:02 UTC  

Of course

2019-01-09 14:09:09 UTC  

Catholics do not use the word essence, because of how the Orthodox have perverted it.

2019-01-09 14:09:17 UTC  

Wait

2019-01-09 14:09:21 UTC  

I'm very very cknfused

2019-01-09 14:09:29 UTC  

Is it one in essence or Being??????

2019-01-09 14:10:01 UTC  

Ok one in being

2019-01-09 14:10:03 UTC  

They are one in essence

2019-01-09 14:10:06 UTC  

Meaning also in essence

2019-01-09 14:10:35 UTC  
2019-01-09 14:10:41 UTC  

Ok

2019-01-09 14:10:45 UTC  

Which means God is one devine being