Message from @[ℂ𝕝𝕠𝕀𝕖𝕕𝔾𝕣𝕠𝕦𝕑] Le sarrep

Discord ID: 670583965773725718


2020-01-25 10:49:49 UTC  

i read 41 "recovered" to 50 something dead on pol

2020-01-25 10:50:17 UTC  

im very unshure about the recovered part

2020-01-25 10:50:21 UTC  

yeah

2020-01-25 10:50:26 UTC  

especialy since we dont get told how they recover

2020-01-25 10:50:44 UTC  

i think its just an attempt of "oh yea we got it under controll"

Thing is I feel like I look like a crazy mf when I express my concerns about it irl

2020-01-25 10:51:15 UTC  

well thats normal lol

2020-01-25 10:51:24 UTC  

its kinda like beeing a conspirarcy theorist

I think they're scared about what could go wrong so they go '' no no don't worry its Okey ''

2020-01-25 10:51:32 UTC  

2020-01-25 10:51:34 UTC  

but our numbers are the official ones

2020-01-25 10:51:41 UTC  

and our doubts are very justified

2020-01-25 10:51:47 UTC  

China is lying about the numbers

2020-01-25 10:52:09 UTC  

most likely, yes

2020-01-25 11:00:43 UTC  

Not with something this infectious

2020-01-25 11:01:14 UTC  
2020-01-25 11:01:28 UTC  

Spanish flu had anywhere between 10-20% mortality rate depending on what sources you read

2020-01-25 11:01:42 UTC  

Humanity would not be able to survive another bubonic plague level event

2020-01-25 11:01:51 UTC  

But Another Spanish Flu?

2020-01-25 11:02:00 UTC  

We'd survive, but there would be dead in the streets

2020-01-25 11:02:21 UTC  

If that is it truly IS as bad as Spanish flu

2020-01-25 11:02:30 UTC  

And judging by the incubation period, I think it might

2020-01-25 11:03:40 UTC  

It's a bioweapon, wouldn't surprise me if it's worse than spanish flu

2020-01-25 11:04:19 UTC  

I really don't know if it is a bioweapon

2020-01-25 11:04:41 UTC  

To make a proper Bio weapon it has to have, well 1 a cure

2020-01-25 11:04:46 UTC  

Otherwise whoever deploys it is fucked

2020-01-25 11:04:50 UTC  

As we can see here in China

2020-01-25 11:05:09 UTC  

And 2 it has to have a fairly short life, so that it doesn't spread too far

2020-01-25 11:05:30 UTC  

Otherwise you'd end up with a global pandemic rather than a targeted effect on a single target

2020-01-25 11:05:37 UTC  

As we can see here on EARTH

2020-01-25 11:05:41 UTC  

That's making the assumption they don't want it to be a global pandemic

2020-01-25 11:06:03 UTC  

Why would they want a global pandemic?

2020-01-25 11:06:07 UTC  

It's fucking China bad

2020-01-25 11:07:21 UTC  

a significantly decreased population would make instituting a one world government far easier, for example

2020-01-25 11:07:33 UTC  

So its not China then,

2020-01-25 11:07:37 UTC  

It's the merchants?