Message from @Nic386
Discord ID: 512392484639473684
That was a joke Swamp.
@FireRising *16 gorillion different 556 mags*
Oh Christ please no
That said, everyone has different opinions on how to use grenade launchers, or indeed, rifle grenades, in combat
BTW I used to like taking a basic bitch M4A1 and then grabbing the 100-round saddle drum tracer mags.
And unlike most other things there’s no clear best one, at least as far as we know
My squad never knew how I hosed my targets with so much lead.
But back to rifle nades yeah
Is a dedicated platform worth losing a rifle for?
Is it better to give everyone rifle grenades like the French?
Or is a simple underbarrel the best way to go?
Honestly I'd say the best option is the most cost effective one. What can give your men the most increase in their capabilities without spending on it disproportionately?
Well, probably rifle grenades
What can use the most different loads?
Probably rifle grenades
Underslung launchers probably.
Beyond has
*gas
Yeah, but think about this: you can fit a larger charge to a rifle grenade
At the cost of range
Or have a proper HEAT round
so you say that the most cost effective option is best, yet you advocated using 2 different systems for rolls that can be filled adequately with one
But which is the best one to settle on?
It might turn out that as with all things, there is no easy answer and the best answer may vary greatly by the resources of a country, the locales it might have to fight in, and the place those grenades might have in the doctrines of the army fielding them.
France and Yugoslavia used rifle grenades to very good effect for decades
France still does
they use an anti personell one and a HEAT one
Everyone else has gone between a dedicated platform and an underbarrel several times
Yeah for the FAMAS
But will those work on the 416?
they work on the NATO standard rifle grenade mounting
far as I can tell
This discussion will go nowhere. For now let's agree that this question is probably more complex than any of us have anywhere close to sufficient qualifications to make any meaningful arguments.
worst case they can add a new muzzle device
the only reason you say that is cause you're wrong but ok
Man fuck you
As I said above.
It might turn out that as with all things, there is no easy answer and the best answer may vary greatly by the resources of a country, the locales it might have to fight in, and the place those grenades might have in the doctrines of the army fielding them.
Deadass I don’t think there’s a right answer yet
All of the systems are effective in their own right, it’s not like some other debates
There probably is no true infantry grenade projector master race.
Or at least, not with the current state of affairs.