Message from @Reichtangle

Discord ID: 513388246018031626


2018-11-17 16:16:12 UTC  

this is a DMR rifle

2018-11-17 16:16:26 UTC  

It's specifically put into a position where there is a requirement of performance

2018-11-17 16:16:33 UTC  

M14 is shit

2018-11-17 16:17:04 UTC  

If it no longer performs, then it's just a big heavy battle rifle with less capacity than the guy next to you

2018-11-17 16:17:18 UTC  

Iron sight SVD for every russian soldier

2018-11-17 16:17:21 UTC  

🙆

2018-11-17 16:18:08 UTC  

To get what you describe out of M14 platform would require a run of new parts, new tooling etc. U.S. military wisely decided to use accurized m16 for DMR and buy precision parts from KAC and similar companies instead of building a whole new factory to make M14 DMR weapons

2018-11-17 16:18:24 UTC  

I’d like to point out there’s a story of a SSgt requesting an M14 for Iraqi freedom “just for the hell of it” and stacking some bodies with it.

2018-11-17 16:19:05 UTC  

i don't believe u

2018-11-17 16:19:08 UTC  

With bonus of less training needed, better compatibility of parts and ammo in emergencies, enemy snipers not murking the guy with the different gun first

2018-11-17 16:19:29 UTC  

keld is stuck in the 60's

2018-11-17 16:19:30 UTC  

nice

2018-11-17 16:19:36 UTC  

The SSgt story? I saw the photos but not the kill record

2018-11-17 16:19:42 UTC  

They decidedly murked the guy with the different gun first

2018-11-17 16:19:55 UTC  

Because it’s very clearly not an M16 or M4

2018-11-17 16:20:13 UTC  

The M14 worked as a battle rifle

2018-11-17 16:20:35 UTC  

It’s not a marksman’s weapon in the state it was issued as the EBR because it didn’t stay accurate

2018-11-17 16:20:48 UTC  

It didn’t even work well as a battle rifle

2018-11-17 16:21:07 UTC  

As evidenced by the length of time it was in service the first time

2018-11-17 16:21:10 UTC  

I said “worked” not “worked well”

2018-11-17 16:21:36 UTC  

It lasted longer than the Krag

2018-11-17 16:22:18 UTC  

Eeeeh it was an ok battle rifle, just almost obsolete at introduction

2018-11-17 16:25:17 UTC  

Then bad

2018-11-17 16:25:22 UTC  

And sort of lied to get into production anyway

2018-11-17 16:25:26 UTC  

Imagine if m14 was issued in 1936

2018-11-17 16:25:34 UTC  

Would have been pretty good

2018-11-17 16:25:40 UTC  

also the Italians did a better job in six years than the Americans did in nine

2018-11-17 16:25:56 UTC  

The BM-59 is what the M14 should have been

2018-11-17 16:26:34 UTC  

I always thought of that weapon as a sort of idealized Garand

2018-11-17 16:26:53 UTC  

Where the m14 is a bastardized Garand

2018-11-17 16:26:54 UTC  

It’s a Garand action worth a detachable box magazine and select fire

2018-11-17 16:27:05 UTC  

Correct

2018-11-17 16:27:27 UTC  

Ergo the 59 is what the M14 should have been

2018-11-17 16:28:50 UTC  

Yeah im with ya there

2018-11-17 16:28:52 UTC  

Even so

2018-11-17 16:29:15 UTC  

If either these rifles were available in 1936 it would have been hot shit

2018-11-17 16:30:33 UTC  

Ah no I was thinking of the FN49

2018-11-17 16:31:37 UTC  

Another weapon that was sort of obsolete at time of manufacture but would have been great at the beginning of WWII

2018-11-17 17:19:54 UTC  

weapons being built at the end of a war, designed using lessons from that conflict, are generally better than the weapons they went into the conflict with

2018-11-17 17:22:27 UTC  

That's just common sense, so yeah if it was produced earlier it would have been good. Well no shit. But that doesn't matter because it was obsolete at the time of production

2018-11-19 14:59:07 UTC  

@Stubbs can I put a 14 inch suppressor on a pistol for memes?
A handgun, not an AR pistol.
Ergonomics would be shit I know, I just wanna know if I can.