Message from @RoflTank

Discord ID: 547205678675001384


2019-02-18 22:03:47 UTC  

Even with serious upgrades to the mobility+High G turns, it has a really large turn radius

2019-02-18 22:07:13 UTC  

Well yeah

2019-02-18 22:07:19 UTC  

That was the goal of the YF-23

2019-02-18 22:07:27 UTC  

Go REALLY fast and be sneeki beeki

2019-02-18 22:08:06 UTC  

Sure, but it has nothing else going for it

2019-02-18 22:08:16 UTC  

not even good ordinance

2019-02-18 23:00:00 UTC  

The HVAA is pretty good if you can get away from the furball and ambush or want to bean annoying AI in the campaign, but that's just about it.

2019-02-18 23:02:42 UTC  

Doesn't it get a tls pod

2019-02-18 23:02:55 UTC  

tls is hot trash

2019-02-18 23:02:55 UTC  

like

2019-02-18 23:02:59 UTC  

it's seriously underpowered

2019-02-18 23:08:53 UTC  

@Innaswamp lmao nope

2019-02-18 23:09:01 UTC  

Only HVAA, 4AAM, and UGB

2019-02-18 23:09:07 UTC  

I rock 4aams

2019-02-18 23:09:13 UTC  

Boom and zoom

2019-02-18 23:10:09 UTC  

The F-35 seems pretty damn good, despite being a dumpster fire IRL so far

2019-02-18 23:58:09 UTC  

The YF-23 should have a significant ordnance payload, that's odd

2019-02-18 23:58:31 UTC  

It was basically a hybrid of an interceptor/intruder/strike bomber

2019-02-18 23:58:57 UTC  

The YF version didn't have way too much, but I bet it would have gotten expanded. Regardless, it isn't too bad at all.

2019-02-18 23:59:22 UTC  

Pretty good for the campaign, but I much prefer the F-15E if I need a fast-ish multirole.

2019-02-19 00:00:00 UTC  

Well it was immediately reproposed to the Navy as a F/B, so I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it could have carried a LOT of ordnance.

2019-02-19 00:00:21 UTC  

One sec, let me ask someone.

2019-02-19 00:00:41 UTC  

And if they don't have the answer, then wiki might have it.

2019-02-19 00:02:40 UTC  

According to it's Wikipedia page, it had provisions made for a M61 Vulcan, 2x AIM-9Xs, and 4x AIM-120s.

2019-02-19 00:03:35 UTC  

Though I wouldn't be surprised if the Navy did try to edge in a reconfiguration considering the FB-22 concept was a thing.

2019-02-19 00:04:33 UTC  

But I don't know off the top of my head if they actually did try to make a pitch for it or not.

2019-02-19 00:05:02 UTC  

It's OK for some campaign missions, but absolute garbo for MP

2019-02-19 00:05:21 UTC  

F-22 can't carry much more than the YF-23 now that I've checked. Dunno if the YF could have handled such a large internal bay though.

2019-02-19 00:05:26 UTC  

You really gotta hope the enemy is dumb enough to either head on or stall

2019-02-19 00:05:31 UTC  

ye

2019-02-19 00:05:45 UTC  

I've been caught in a stall fight a few times.

2019-02-19 00:06:23 UTC  

And the the F-22 was more so what the USAF was looking for at the time from my understanding. Better overall, but the YF-23 wasn't bad either.

2019-02-19 00:06:48 UTC  

Regardless, the only mission I think I've really used the YF-23 a lot in AC7 would be M19.

2019-02-19 00:07:02 UTC  

Ambushes on the drone leads are EZ.

2019-02-19 00:07:34 UTC  

The F-22 is overall better than the YF-23. It's more maneuverable and more stable with better stealth capabilities. I think it's only downfall IRL is it's a tad slower

2019-02-19 00:07:59 UTC  

Which isn't saying much since it's cleared for mach 2.5

2019-02-19 00:08:08 UTC  

Wrong on stealth

2019-02-19 00:08:21 UTC  

YF-23 had a lower RCS and higher top speed

2019-02-19 00:08:36 UTC  

F-22 was more maneuverable but a decent bit slower

2019-02-19 00:09:55 UTC  

It was basically a choice of "interceptor" or "fighter", which would have worked but the Air Force is retarded and can't make up their minds.

2019-02-19 00:10:20 UTC  

So they took the fighter, and then immediately forced it in to an interceptor and F/B role