Message from @Magos Squid "The Life Raft"

Discord ID: 547211869396664360


2019-02-19 00:20:05 UTC  

Wow the B-21 looks like a non-clusterfuck program

2019-02-19 00:20:54 UTC  

Major part compaitibilities, open system architecture, under 1b so far, based on the B-2 so the development cost should be low.

2019-02-19 00:21:14 UTC  

Just wait till the contractor gets a hold of it

2019-02-19 00:21:17 UTC  

then creates artificial delays

2019-02-19 00:21:51 UTC  

@FrostBite'sAce The MQ-101 drones in AC7 look suspiciously like the B-21 <:smugflat:500075410487377922> <:wendy:360615134407819276>

2019-02-19 00:22:04 UTC  

thought the pentagon was cracking down on vaporware spending

2019-02-19 00:22:13 UTC  

"The AF wants a Penetrating Counter-Air fighter to escort B-21's in to enemy airspace"

2019-02-19 00:22:16 UTC  

@Magos Squid "The Life Raft" Actually, hold that thought.

2019-02-19 00:22:20 UTC  

So basically a YF-23

2019-02-19 00:22:35 UTC  

Jesus christ can the AF make up their fucking minds

2019-02-19 00:22:46 UTC  

nope

2019-02-19 00:22:47 UTC  

@RoflTank It's not just the AF deciding anymore

2019-02-19 00:22:50 UTC  

gotta buy more f-22's goy

2019-02-19 00:22:52 UTC  

<:happymerchant:263435754779312130>

2019-02-19 00:23:16 UTC  

We're pretty much back into the mindset of post-WW2 where ***everyone*** gets to say what they want

2019-02-19 00:23:33 UTC  

Ooooooohhhhhh the X-47 gives me the big iron

2019-02-19 00:23:35 UTC  

>Northrop Grumman

Okay, nvm. Maybe it wont get fucked up by the contractor

2019-02-19 00:23:51 UTC  

Northrop produces that good shit

2019-02-19 00:24:28 UTC  

Also they get extra points for realizing that BWB and flying wings are the best airframes.

2019-02-19 00:24:36 UTC  

it's what made the F-35 into a burning trashcan.
Every branch gets to say what they want in the new plane, but only 1 contractor gets the contract instead of several contracts, 1 -2 per branch like it used to be.

2019-02-19 00:24:48 UTC  

You're not wrong

2019-02-19 00:25:11 UTC  

The AF is getting their planes fucked because they have to fill 4 branches worth of mission profiles with one airframe

2019-02-19 00:25:42 UTC  

But then the AF wants to delet the airframes that are dedicated to other branches

2019-02-19 00:25:56 UTC  

Because the AF is stupid

2019-02-19 00:26:06 UTC  

And they have too much responsibility in a single branch

2019-02-19 00:26:18 UTC  

^^

2019-02-19 00:26:24 UTC  

That last statement is entirely true

2019-02-19 00:26:49 UTC  

You could easily section out the AF in to 3 new branches that are smaller, easier to manage, and less bloated

2019-02-19 00:27:09 UTC  

>What is Space Command

2019-02-19 00:27:15 UTC  

That should pull some duties away from the AF

2019-02-19 00:27:27 UTC  

^

2019-02-19 00:27:42 UTC  

Literally make Space Com its own branch, the logistics and C3 required to manage orbital and extra-orbital anything is insane

2019-02-19 00:29:01 UTC  

There's the USAAF, the USAAB the USNAF, and the USMCA all saying what the fuck they want, but only 1 contract

2019-02-19 00:29:30 UTC  

honestly the USAF should just be in charge of air superiority. Nothing else.

2019-02-19 00:29:38 UTC  

They make fighters and shoot down planes.

2019-02-19 00:29:45 UTC  

NORAD handles strategic bombers

2019-02-19 00:29:47 UTC  

dont forget bombers

2019-02-19 00:30:03 UTC  

Nah, leave bombers to the individual branches

2019-02-19 00:30:07 UTC  

Strategic =/= Tactical

2019-02-19 00:30:14 UTC  

They can tailor them to their mission profiles