@_Nipa better than m05

cus M04 is better

so wrong

+

MP5k is the most aesthetic variant

You misspelled MP5/10

10mm is the correct mm

MP5 in 7.62x51

>Taking a G3 seriously

>Not taking a G3 seriously

G3 is fucking lit

MP5 Carryon

I personally don't like the Mp5

@Nic386 >Taking a G3 half seriously

I love Mp5s, can't wait to use one in the service/qual on one.

>Not using the superior 6.5 CBJ

G3 22Lr kit hue

>Be me
>Get early gen rattling G3.
>Use 22lr kit on the G3.
>Sporterize it to look like a normal 22.
>Show it to gun lovers online to hurt them

>Paint it babyshit green

Can you not

Also what's a "normal .22"

How is that any more "Normal" than a 10/22, or a browning take down

It's not? @Nic386

I never said that.

Believe me, I looked at those too to shitpost.

I asked what a "Normal .22" was and you posted that. If that's your answer to my question, it would imply hat you think that's more normal

If it was just a random .22 you wanted to post then fair enough

I don't think it's more normal, it was poor phrasing. By normal, I mean commonplace. The only other weapon I can think of 22 that is more common is the 10/22 tbh though there may be others.

And I almost chose it.

I decided to choose the most fuddish looking one, and used that as my metric.

I guess commonplace makes more sense than normal in this context, and yeah, the general category of "wood stock, bolt action, .22" works for the duds look

Basically going for the most fuddish/sporterized look for that greentext

How would you get a G3 converted into .22 to look like a bolt action?

Or for hat matter shove it in a no pistol grip stock

Because you don't want it to look like an assault weapon

You would use the 22 kit, remove the pistol grip and add a trigger guard. You'd have to make a custom stock.

Furthermore, some metal if not all of the workings would still show so you'd have to make a fudd wood body/stock to compensate.

Maybe even have to mannlicher it