the fact that they still have peoples guns is the bad part

too bad

I was hoping they'd succeed

not sure if they priced their product too low and failed to recoup costs or what

https://www.firearmrack.com/why-guns-are-expensive-explained-by-a-gun-manufacturer/

Cy says there that it could have been double the price

take that for whatever it's worth at this point

Look at the Brno 7.5 or whatever it's name is

It very well could have gone higher but who would pay for a niche pistol but rich guys

yea, the pistol isn't revolutionary

but the cartridge could go places

the issue was the development

That cartridge in a PCC would wreck

forget PCC, handguns

The Hudson was a 9mm

The 7.5 in a PCC would be legit

why bother

Because rich guys would pay for it

Why else

the reason it was developed was to give you 7.62x39 power in a handgun

I don't see many in this server paying 6000 plus for a pistol

if I wanted it in a PCC, I'd get an SBR

you want to know why?

it costs $7500?

Because pew pew

no

because the guy who owns the company is independently wealthy

and

they were approached with developing it

Hudson or the other?

Oh

the requestor dropped out mid way through

Yeah to have developed this he would need that kind of money

and the company decided to proceed

so they developed both the gun and cartridge

and produce both

That cartridge in a Mauser C96 looking gun would be legit

no it wouldnt

Yes it would

I like Mauser pistols

They feel good to me