Message from @asdfgasdfgasdfaoklk

Discord ID: 291760377635667970


2017-03-16 02:27:55 UTC  

We can reverse this shit without murdering people.

2017-03-16 02:27:56 UTC  

The state is part of the individual

2017-03-16 02:28:06 UTC  

guys obama care is better than trump care : D

2017-03-16 02:28:14 UTC  

save booggie : C

2017-03-16 02:28:20 UTC  

@I'mGoingBerserk define working against.

2017-03-16 02:28:20 UTC  

To target the one is to target the entirety of the state.

2017-03-16 02:28:56 UTC  

because in some circumstances I would agree. Like if you are sabataging shit, or lieing to cops during investigations, or blocking roads.

2017-03-16 02:29:07 UTC  

>roads

2017-03-16 02:29:20 UTC  

But not for dissent.

2017-03-16 02:29:25 UTC  

Not every individual will agree with the system in all ways, but he must at least work in accordance with the system if he wishes to stay within the state.

2017-03-16 02:29:30 UTC  

I live in michiland there are only potholes

2017-03-16 02:29:36 UTC  

Look

2017-03-16 02:29:57 UTC  

The state exists for the people and is comprised of the people

2017-03-16 02:30:08 UTC  

Without the people there is no state

2017-03-16 02:30:20 UTC  

As in you have to pay taxes and follow the law? Or as in you need to agree with party line?

2017-03-16 02:30:49 UTC  

So the state must be subordinate to the people, to declare otherwise is to enslave the people in service to a nonperson

2017-03-16 02:30:56 UTC  

That is immoral

2017-03-16 02:31:04 UTC  

Utopia is impossible but removing undesirables is necessary for a system to function at it's highest possible capacity.

2017-03-16 02:31:25 UTC  

When I say work in accordance with the state I mean don't be a fucking commie traitor.

2017-03-16 02:31:34 UTC  

policy change for the people is imperative for a growing economy

2017-03-16 02:31:53 UTC  

IMO as long as you aren't an unwilling drain on society (unwilling as in you steal or commit fraud, not as in on charity) you should be left alone.

2017-03-16 02:31:59 UTC  

Define what makes one undesirable. I defibe undersirables as those who place their rule of the state over the oeople's rule of the state

2017-03-16 02:32:12 UTC  

People should be encouraged to contribute positivly, but not required.

2017-03-16 02:32:39 UTC  

Tyrants must always be deposed, if not by words then force, and if force proves inadequate then by blood.

2017-03-16 02:32:40 UTC  

Those who refuse to benefit society. Those who break the law. Those who steal. Those who betray the nation.

2017-03-16 02:33:12 UTC  

What benefits society but that which benefits the people

2017-03-16 02:33:15 UTC  

@Burnside givng free medical to people like boogie

2017-03-16 02:33:24 UTC  

Define free

2017-03-16 02:33:47 UTC  

A man must be procured to provide that service

2017-03-16 02:34:02 UTC  

Medical care does not provide itself

2017-03-16 02:34:14 UTC  

Those who are too weak to refrain from slipping into degenerate behaviors are not fit for absolute freedom.

2017-03-16 02:34:16 UTC  

Refuse to benefit society as in going on welfare when they can work, or as in not working to their full potential, living a minimalitic life, and retiring when they could still work?

2017-03-16 02:34:24 UTC  

taxes are diverted towards the care of the people vs letting the people choose there medical services for non ER visits

2017-03-16 02:34:26 UTC  

idk enough

2017-03-16 02:34:58 UTC  

just as you cannot subordinate people to an object, it is given that you cannot subordinate a man to another man

2017-03-16 02:35:49 UTC  

If a man wishes, for a time of his choosing, to subordinate himself before another, that is his freedom to do so

2017-03-16 02:35:53 UTC  

@I'mGoingBerserk if you don't glorify degeneracy and you force people to live with the consequences of their degenercy, then the problem ususally solves itself

2017-03-16 02:36:09 UTC  

But you cannot force him to unwillingly be subordinate

2017-03-16 02:36:17 UTC  

That is tyranny