@Victortzeits funny you are calling me brainwashed when all I have done is questioned what I've been taught

ahh no, all you have done is make claims you cannot back up

ive been taught that i cant fly. i should question that

@Reaper No, i'm glad you're questioning things, but you shouldn't question things that are selfevident

hang on imma go jump out this window

nono, you got it wrong too

its okay to question things

vic shut up i can fly

if you can actually have proof of it

of course you can

now go jump out of the window

and fly away you glorious bastard

Ok proofs

**flashbacks to a house s6 e1 where a crazy man jumps of window to fly **

the fact that you say they never publish they got it wrong juts shows how much you dont know

they publish it all the time

Check music lounge xd

calling other people's research bullshit is one of the primary thing scientists do, well actual scientists anyway.

A recently killed seal dated at 1300 years old (atlantic journal Vol 6. 1971, pg 11)

yeah, 1971

Shells from living snails were dated using the Carbon 14 method. The results stated that the snails had died 27,000 years ago. (Science vol. 224 1984 pg. 58-61)

yeah look at the date

carbon dating is only reconized in the 60s

Look at the method

it takes time to refine a method

ur a snail.

k imma go try axiom verge now and stop being a jackass

Has carbon dating been modified? That is something YOU would have to prove

actualyl yes, they took atomsphere change into account for example

hell its on the wiki page

@Victortze goes back to the same problem, how can anyone know the earth s atmospheric composition at any exact date in the past?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating most of your "problem' can be solved by just looking at the wiki, even

its called cross-examination, the tree ring is a example of it

@Victortzeif wiki = truth were fucked bro

Look up feminism on wiki too

"even wiki can answer your question" means that your question is so... basic that it doesn't take a paper to explain it.

honestly I really shouldn't waste time talking to a science denier

@Victortze carbon dating is super simple then

but I have some time this morning

Why not just explain

it kinda is