I guess one have you has seen time bend before

if your the one denying something you provide the evidence

Try to split some matter

@shadowlessnexusi did

@Reaper **ZA WARUDO**

you saying stuff isnt evidence

"well its a pile of rocket" have a high margin of error for sure

These guys say 1971 and 1984 do not exist

@shadowlessnexus I cited scientific journals

you are saying that 1 inaccuracy means the entire science is worthless

you know how many "inaccurate' science happens in the classroom alone ? lol

Hey, nice nickname.

it is not accurate, but a pretty good aproximation

@Reaper sure thing mr scinence sperg

also, by your own account

What about a freshly killed seal? Well, they dated one of those too, the results stated that the seal had died 1,300 years ago. (Antarctic Journal vol. 6 Sept-Oct 1971 pg. 211)

if the evil scientists are covering up the in accuracy

how did you find them in scientist journals again?

Shells from living snails were dated using the Carbon 14 method. The results stated that the snails had died 27,000 years ago. (Science vol. 224 1984 pg. 58-61)

but let's keep moving the goal post shall we?

I tried. Good luck @Victortze <:bye:480186137164382208>

Give evidence: gives evidence... reeeee

move the goal post, move the goal post, weeeee

Do you even know what moving the goal post is?

yeah

listen science dude. im sick of watching you provide non arguements. it was funny. now its just annoying

I will say this is not real science

My argument is that carbon dating is innacurate

then I will say scientists are bad

then I agree science are not accurate

but I will question how is science accurate

this is what moving the goalpost looks like

Exactly where is the goal post, I just got here

as all science, which you admited earlier

so your entire argument is now null

@Baron Doom Up his ass, so there's still a long way to move it further

talk about sperging

@Victortze I never made that argument I suggested that one being a scientist does not put them above reproach

good you got your last non arguement in

thanks for playing

VictortzeToday at 1:59 AM
okay let's make it blunt" there's no such thing as accurate science"
VictortzeToday at 1:59 AM
or you never heard of margin of error?
ReaperToday at 1:59 AM
@Victortze I agree