Message from @SH3LLSH0CK
Discord ID: 548614581581250590
Nice
200 more than t gay according to the first stream that comes up on youtube
400
<:skaterGasm:284219736181702657>
500
Ima get a beer
Just what about sex exactly is so scarring?
@Xychotic Maybe some men, if that were me there may have been a nail-gun accident
teenage girls can't consent because women, boys are never victims
@Sickswing Seeing a fat bitch naked
Well that
I don't watch pewdiepie but he represents more than his shitty content
he's the old guard of yt before the corporate take over
@SH3LLSH0CK That's what I'm saying. We're supposed to be this giant threat to women, they literally ruin our lives, and the hockey mask just stays in the drawer way more often than not. It's so backwards.
I remember being both 16, 17. I can't attach any trauma to sexual experiences. Would've dreamed to have done it with a 35yo teacher who had her tits bursting out of her shirt. Why is it exactly that it somehow damages the girls?
Well, in a world where age of consent isn't a thing, you're right.
Just trying to logic it
But it is a thing.
If consensual sex is rape than all it does is diminish actual rape
And since we're the only ones that can be destroyed by this, we should stay informed and not take any chances.
Rape is only immoral to begin with because you are damaging what is or is going to be another man's property.
Just because some dumb ass law makers call something rape doesn't mean it's rape @Xychotic
@SH3LLSH0CK okay, that is why they say we're angry incels
@frugalcasper That is ***__exactly__*** what makes it rape.
But I agree you should know the law
@Xychotic Lawmakers define language or do they define law?
When defining law, they assign definitions to the language used in the law.
It's a really big deal in law.
So how do you guys define rape?
In day to day, any non consensual sexual intercourse.
It's 2019, looking at a female for longer than 0.5 seconds is rape.
You could refer to the article, number or ID of the law to define punishment or deed that fits that bill. Law can't capture language. It's simply not possible, language is much older than any law.
@Xychotic I get that what you are saying and for the purpose of law I would agree. But simply calling murder partial birth abortion it doesn't change the act
When someone talks of rape you can define rape by law or the actual original meaning of the word.
In feminist land with the improbability drive cranked up to 11, anything a man does or doesn't do.
The idea of consent, that women should be able to decide who they have sex with is hilarious
I had to make sure cuz the chat was going down a dangerous path
What about guys?
Case and point, law can own the meaning of a deed in one country. You can still speak this language in another where deed is not a crime.
Just like when a 17 year old has consensual sex with a 15 year old. It's not that same thing as forcing sex on an unwilling person
The only way that ends is 12 kids with multiple-felony Tyrone