Kinda bothersome

Is there any objective evidence that R kelly is guilty

Probably dates and time stamps on the photos.

Or is it just more metoo bullshir

Problem is, it's all supposedly past the statute of limitations.

Also good morning

Good morning, sir.

👌

What do the photos reveal

Photos

My understanding is they reveal the act, date, and time.

Don't quote me, though.

Ok

Well if theres evidence theres an actual case

Not if it's past the statute of limitations.

Care to explain what that means please

Ill google it if you dont want to

@Revel There’s a limit on how long ago a crime can have occurred and the accused still be tried for it.

It’s one of the few redemptive elements of our legal system left.

Wow

Applies for evidence, as well, and the limit on the evidence isn’t always the same as the crime, too.

Im assuming its crime dependent

Yes.

And country/state/even county or province dependent.

🤔

Hes being slaughtered on this radio show rn

I dont know the evidence tho

At least witches were given trials.

<:har:480186132298989569>

Nobody knows the evidence right now, just the accusations.

Oh ffs. So its just heresy

You can’t possibly know actual, admissible evidence until it’s in court and being vetted according to law.

Mm

Doesn’t stop people from pretending though. Always interesting how they’re “certain” the evidence makes the person guilty. See any accusation in the era of #MeToo.

Clearly, if they had sex, he’s guilty. There’s your evidence. Wait, stop looking at all the proof it was a mutual relationship! I already told you the evidence! Stop looking for truth!

So far i hear only women coming out of woodworks

They always do.

And the white knights <:ree:480188470942498827>

Most of these chicks walk away richer than they started, just for sitting on the bandwagon for 15 minutes.

LUL

radio host cuck said as a society we love blaming women