Message from @Drogo_Baggins

Discord ID: 554453203182419998


2019-03-10 23:55:49 UTC  

@Z-Man (soon to be Y A) it hacks their hypergamy is my guess.

2019-03-10 23:56:14 UTC  

I guess

2019-03-10 23:56:15 UTC  

Would i want to marry a woman of the 18th century knowing women's nature ?

2019-03-10 23:56:22 UTC  

If i could

2019-03-10 23:56:23 UTC  

hacking hypergamy is a fools errand... pua thinking

2019-03-10 23:56:36 UTC  

only if Iwas living in the 18th century as well

2019-03-10 23:56:38 UTC  

not here

2019-03-10 23:56:58 UTC  

because the would be an asset in that stage of history

2019-03-10 23:57:14 UTC  

but marrying someone NOW? I pass

2019-03-10 23:57:22 UTC  

Same bro

2019-03-10 23:57:51 UTC  

being an asset is irrelavent n a world where all assets r disposable...

2019-03-10 23:57:55 UTC  

Both women and men have dark natures, but just because the seed exists...it doesn't mean that it needs to be watered

2019-03-10 23:57:57 UTC  

and housework back then was real work, long, exhausting, grueling

2019-03-10 23:58:08 UTC  

I honestly just want a son but i can't even have that anymore

2019-03-10 23:58:15 UTC  

so women are lazy now for a simple reason: because they can be, they can rely on old fashioned notions of male privision while at the same time have the options that modernity offers

2019-03-10 23:58:16 UTC  

It is the society that enforces marriage and keeps hypergamy in check. Without that, marriage is a playing russian roulette with a semi-auto

2019-03-10 23:58:27 UTC  

It's up to men to create an environment where dark nature can't run rampant

2019-03-10 23:58:44 UTC  

That goes for both men and women

2019-03-10 23:58:57 UTC  

the extreme of hypergamy is gynocentrism.... the extreme of dominance is extreme statism... they enable and destroy each other....

2019-03-10 23:58:59 UTC  

So, in the 18th century marriage worked with almost any woman.
Today, marriage doesn't work with almost any woman

2019-03-10 23:59:04 UTC  

@Xezyr No. Either you're a young fool who doesn't understand the world and you would marry, or you understand women and won't have anything to do with having one in your life and wouldn't marry from any century.

2019-03-10 23:59:48 UTC  

why would I care about marraige anyways? I just want kids of my own and custody of them

2019-03-11 00:00:26 UTC  

That's why I'm on board with surrogacy.

2019-03-11 00:00:33 UTC  

all else is unnecesary fluff

2019-03-11 00:00:35 UTC  

And gattaca babies.

2019-03-11 00:00:39 UTC  

@Z-Man (soon to be Y A) Make a deal with a Mexican woman. Have her be your surrogate.

2019-03-11 00:00:41 UTC  
2019-03-11 00:01:16 UTC  

Look at X-23. Those Mexican genes are the shit!

2019-03-11 00:01:35 UTC  

if the legal framework was such that joint custody is automatic, that would erode thye reason for child support and alimony to exist

2019-03-11 00:01:35 UTC  

@Xychotic and artificial wombs....

2019-03-11 00:01:54 UTC  

What's x-23 @LOGICWINS

2019-03-11 00:01:56 UTC  

?

2019-03-11 00:02:03 UTC  

When they are available, we can skip the surrogates, except breast feeding is still very good for children.

2019-03-11 00:02:23 UTC  

@LOGICWINS I am hispanic as well *strums guitar*

2019-03-11 00:02:30 UTC  

@GingerSnaps Watch "Logan". Wolverine's daughter was created by a Mexican surrogate

2019-03-11 00:02:44 UTC  

It was funny when she was cursing at him.

2019-03-11 00:02:51 UTC  

@Z-Man (soon to be Y A) Perfect. You can make your daughter tacos!

2019-03-11 00:02:58 UTC  

And she would enjoy them!

2019-03-11 00:03:14 UTC  

@Xychotic w/modern formula n the same interactions a woman is not even required for neural development b4 weaning....

2019-03-11 00:03:15 UTC  

I once asked my mother mamy time if she was dumb or liar, now i understand she is both.

2019-03-11 00:03:20 UTC  

@Xychotic And then he told her to shut the fuck up lol