Message from @Chaos Marine
Discord ID: 492872377261096971
(The CO2 forms carbonic acid.)
Someone needs to do a clickbaitey "strangest mammals" video with them, platypi, and echidnas
What are some other weird mammals
I never used to understand it, but the more I learn, the more I realise why people keep naked mole rats as pets.
armadillos are the only animals besides humans that can contract leporsy and yes, it can jump between them and humans.
I've seen quite a few Echidnas, and some platypuses. Tasmanian platypuses are huge.
Bonobos are psychotially murderous, but scientists ignore that to push a free love globohomo agenda
I haven't seen actual scientists ignore it, but popsci guys and people who are not scientists certainly do.
@Grumplebee Biologically, naked mole rats take the strangeness cake. Their ribosomes, basic cellular units conserved througout eukaryotes, are split into three, rather than two units to achieve very high fidelity translation. Your ribosomes are more similar to yeast than they are to those of these mammals.
I should have said documentarians.
These are just some of my opinions on brexit of where it is going and how it might get there. there's a lot covered in here. From why i voted to leave, my opinion on how the government is doing a "great job," if there could be a leadership challenge, if there could be a general election and what would happen if a second referendum happened. please i did this so we could all talk about in the comment section please be civil and have a discussion about what could happen to brexit. https://youtu.be/xm-sj50PAIs
Jim's great and all, but he's come a long way hasn't he? Here's the thing about him. He's a Gen X'er with serious cognative dissonance. On the one hand he wants to change the world. But he also has fully incorporated the worst meme gen x used to define itself. Actually, genuinely caring about *anything* is an unforgivable sin. However, he can't help but care about things. This fills him with self hate when he realizes that yes, he does indeed care about things.
Jim is such a pretentious cunt at times
He tried turning GG into his own personal troll army and it didn't want to and he rage quit
My first iteration of that statement actually had a statement about Jim being assmad that he couldn't get a personal army.
Jim can be entertaining
He can do good deconstruction of stuff
And he has a far reaching knowledge of a lot of web drama
Oh he's a true artist in the medium of destruction.
And he's funny with it too
I do that too, unlike him I haven't been able to monetize it yet.
But his attitude that caring for something is for chumps or caring about anything makes you a lolcow reminds me kids from school who were trying to be too cool for anything
But like I said it's because he has these moments where he explodes with self hatred because he realizes that despite all his "agent of chaos" rhetoric. He does, indeed, care about things.
Yep, that's a gen x thing and a major contributor to cuckery. I think it's a trap leftists put into culture (not sure if intentionally) for dissidents.
Namely, convince all non leftists that caring about anything is for lame-o's via a combination of postmodernism and nhilism. This will keep them from forming significant organized resistance. Because organized resistance will end up baring a bit of a resemblance to what it opposes (because organized) and their heads will explode with self hatred.
BPS is agreeing with @Thomas O'Malley that the Democratic base is "crazy"
i find it hard to believe that identity politics is a higher priority than winning back the white house
unless they are intentionally trying to lose the '20 election and speed up the takeover
"we lost because we were not diverse enough"
i just see no reason for the DNC ticket not being Biden + harris/warren/oscasio-cortez
that way both factions are satisfied for now so it kills two birds with one stone
and Biden has the best chance of getting the white working class votes
and the 2016 primaries showed who was inn control of the party, the center-left establishment
Hillary didn't win the primaries in 2016 because she was establishment, she won because nonwhites, especially blacks, voted for her in large numbers.
If they are given the choice between a white establishment Democrat and a white populist Democrat, nonwhites will choose the establishment one. But if the choice is between a white Democrat and a nonwhite Democrat, they will choose one of their own every time.
so you are suggesting that the party is so fractured that it doesn't have a coherent strategy when it comes to winning elections?
I'm saying that when the Democratic base goes to the polls in the primaries, they won't be voting based on who they think is most likely to beat Trump.
i disagree but i can see your point