Message from @Dinosorcerer
Discord ID: 472913961021341707
the Christian Syrian attacking Isis forces part
"as Syrian forces fight to retake ground close to Israeli-held territory."
its retaking its own territory which is currently held by isis fighters
"Israel considers the occupied Golan Heights, and the airspace above it, as Israeli sovereign territory, though this is not recognised internationally."
part of golan is illegally occupied by israel
israel CLAIMS the craft entered its air space by 2km, at attack speeds thats less than a few seconds
when israel is constantly breaching both syrian and lebanons air space and attacking syrian and iranian forces well inside syria it has no right to complain
I don't doubt that he was going after ISIS fighters, and what's more, I don't doubt that Israel is funding them if for no other reason than to give Syria a hard time, but to be honest it still sounds like a very he said, she said situation, you know? what neither of these articles confirms, however, is your assertion that the pilot was christian. where are you getting that from? and why the fuck are you pissing your eyes out about the fact that the UN never confirmed Israel's acquisition of the Golan Heights. what are you, a globalist cuck?
you know assad is protecting christians, right?
i read the pilot was christian, they are a minority over there
Where did you read the pilot was christian?
regardless, if israel constantly invades both syrian and other countries airspace illegally to bomb in support of its isis fighters what right does it have to shoot down a jet who accidently crosses into its own legal territy for a matter of seconds
as for israels illegal occupation of golan, i believe that is called a war crime... its sure as fuck against international law and the geneva convention
Commies use this exact same argument form. "Sovereinty is a spook. What right does the US have to keep out floods of immigrants, to defend its borders and sovereignty when it violates that of so many other nations?"
how is it against the Geneva convention?
@ebowden i forget which news article it was
Of course.
the taking of lands by aggression i beleive
its certainly a breach of international law but im pretty sure its part of Geneva as well, or at least thats where the law comes from
Geneva convention has nothing to do with territories, dude
lol
So knowledgable.
it's just to make sure that people aren't bending the civillian population over a table or mistreating POWs. otherwise you can occupy all the territory you want
@Dinosorcerer You need to get a good white nationalist education, what's all this shiet about which laws are which? Don't you know that knowledge is for commies?
guess you dont know as much as you think you do.... but ium certainly no expert on it....
yeah. it talks about the treatment of the people in the occupied territory in question.not whether or not you can occupy it
which is why the UN has some 60 iirc rulings against israel when the rest of the world only has 3
that's a different matter entirely
Jesus, have we got both Commies and Nazis here?
nothing to do with the Geneva convention
@KAПИTAHA this dunb fuck thinks that commies "no fixed borders" isnt commie.....
xaxaxaaxax
I know commies.
the ones that watch anime?
No. The modern ones hate borders.
and support LGBT