That's a riddle I struggle with.

What a troublesome riddle. "Why is violence against people for exercising their free speech only ok when I and my ilk do it, but not when others do it?"

The answer is that neither are ok, and that you are a hypocritical thug without principles.

One the one hand I despise every single one of their beliefs and actions.

On the other hand the path of non violence and "non violence" is what got us where we are today. It's cuckoldry.

lol

in the end the only things that matter politically are optics and PR.

history is written by the victor

"We are where we are because we weren't violent thugs mmkay."

lol

So you kill your opponents, take their kids, and tell them you were the good guy.

Conservatards are hilarious.

No, conservatives are where they are, and communists are on the rise because conservatives did the exact things to commies and liberals that are today being done to them and fascists.

This created a wave of disgust for conservatives persecuting people for their beliefs, and sympathy for the persecuted; liberals and commies.

Liberals got where they are today by being violent thugs and sucessfully lying and saying they aren't via media collusion.

lol

No...

That's moronic.

They are where they are because of conservatives.

What they are doing today is what will elevate conservatives and put them into the position conservatives were in.

Conservaitves tell themselves that lie generation after generation and are only further marginalized as a reward.

Despite what most MSM say about antifa, most Americans are disgusted by them and know exactly what they are, and this disgust is increasing.

(Whilst trust in the lying MSM continues to drop.)

I hope you're right, but I doubt it.

This is supported by polls taken over the years. The media may lie about antifa, but it isn't working.

I am not surprised that you seem to want to make conservatives violent thugs like antifa are for the sake of winning.

Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.

lol

I remember listening to you fantasise about exerting power over women, forcing porn actors to be continually pregnant if they want to work. It was disgusting.

Personally seen what happens when you "win" but didn't obliterate your opponent, mutilate their family, and indoctrinate their kids, and salt the earth.

lol

You were drooling over the thought of a nice little theocracy.

The point of that was to make production of porn practically impossible without making it illegal.

I am well aware of the retarded point.

Honestly, I'm shocked you remembered. These days it seems nobody remembers anything. Good on ya. 😀

There is already so much porn that that would do nothing to stem whatever problems it causes, but what it would do is force women to bear children constantly if they wanted to keep working in the industry.

I would also point out I posted that in shitposting

I was initially willing to overlook that public display of lust for power over women's bodies, even though it sounded like a speech from some character in a feminist screed.

You do make a good point about the existing porn.

But now you start talking about becoming like antifa for the sake of winning, and I see no disgusted introspection. No "Wait a minute, what the fuck am I thinking?", just apparent desire to do any foul deed for the sake of victory.

It is strange.