* purpose

The other one.

what about clarity?

What about clarity?

not clear enough

If you want clarity of conscience, you have to clarify your purpose.

you're in an infinite loop rn

break outta it

I bloody told you they are intertwined.

ik u did

but happens when you break out of the loop?

You're gonna hold up a circle at me and tell me I'm in an infinite loop like it's a bad thing?!

i never said it was a bad thing

"you're in an infinite loop rn
break outta it"

yeah what's wrong with that?

clarity as a whole - derived from streamlining

A) it's against the point of the principle.
B) The clear implication that the loop has a alternative, superior options.

then you can integrate with limits: 1. conscience and 2. purpose

That's just picking an arbitrary starting point on the loop.

i don't know if there's an alternative - that's why i want you to break out of it and see if there is

This principle is distillation of many concepts.

Once you reach a core principle, there isn't anything smaller.

At least, nothing that still makes sense.

how can you be sure ?

Because that's the nature of a principle.

yeah ik it is, but how do you know you've reached a first principle

is there a test?

Yeah, I haven't found anything smaller that still makes sense.

the only test you could do is try and break out of it and see if you can reach the same output with less nested logic

what does 'smaller' mean

larger scope of application?

A more granular approach.

how do uno it's more granular

less nested logic?

Sure, that's one way.

what's another way

Simpler individual concepts.

that's the same thing

More concise language.

Oh, so, less nested logic is code for all possible ways to break down a concept?

fuck sake my dad is telling me about the rugby