<@396901899724521482> Can't by nature. You must subvert the human psychology (which is built for hunter-gatherer harems) by making rules that do not 'feel good' because the not feel good bit works better in the new enviorment.

Wanting to go around killing them is.

Humans are rare in that they can do that which does not feel good. But most cannot avoid this.. and especially not women.

Not sure incel is the right word for that

Optimism is the popular ego state, because pessimism interrupts pleasure seeking.

You saying any violent mob with prejudice is inherently unfuckable?

Just look at the obesity rate and tell me humans will do what is against their nature because it is good for them.

It's not. But we're mgtows, and if you start talking about killing, you start sliding into incel territory.

I was talking about rooting simps out of the discord but ok

And joking on top of that

Oh. Then, yeah. Do it.

Basically it's consciousness is a magical blessing versus consciousness is a curse and we are nothing but meat puppets being animated by our biology. Differing only from animals in scale.

Ok lets talk. They are built to love differently. The emotion you think of as love a women does not feel.

<@396901899724521482> The problem you're overlooking is that men and women define it differently anyway.

There you go, Kragt's got it on point.

@Kragt thats why I don't like Anime, it's men projecting the best of themselves on women.

They have their own feeling which is tied to your status, wealth, genes etc... they always want the best mate. And they will love that mate. While he is the best mate. One a better mate comes along they now love the new mate.

This is hypergamy.

If you do not understand this then we need to break from MGTOW talk and talk evolution, and game theory.

Woman love what you can do for them. resources.

emotional tampon

@Flushtater They also love genetics.

It's just most guys will not have those genetics.

they call that love because its what their biology tells them to do: bond to resources

Correct <@396901899724521482>

<@396901899724521482> I never said it was amoral.
But womens love is conditional. The divorce rate speaks volumes to this. Silver divorces speak volumes to this. Single motherhood rates speak volumes to this.

While not amoral it is artifical and conditional

To them, it would be immoral to not lock down the greatest source of resources for them and their children.

That's how you're describing it

amoral and immoral are different.

It's their nature it's to further a species

And, no, women are not very good at morals.

<@396901899724521482> Fair enough, but I am describing it how it is. And nature is Amoral. Make no mistake. If rape works for reproducing nature will favor rape.

Someone said earlier, black pill eventually doesn't even matter to black pill. That's true. It was painful to digest, that we are just meat puppets, but it ends up very liberating, because I stopped pretending and beating myself up for not being some ideal person.

I would disagree

But to each their own morals

It's still moral. To them.

It's moral to me it just shouldn't be lied about

amoral - a meaning without and moral. Nature has no morality. It is only concerned with who passes on their genes and who does not.

Nature isn't even concerned about that.

What if we are God's unwanted step-children? so be it. We don't need him. --Fight Club