Message from @Whats gay anymore

Discord ID: 531418812076130318


2019-01-06 10:24:47 UTC  

It's just most guys will not have those genetics.

2019-01-06 10:25:00 UTC  

they call that love because its what their biology tells them to do: bond to resources

2019-01-06 10:25:12 UTC  

Correct <@396901899724521482>

2019-01-06 10:25:48 UTC  

<@396901899724521482> I never said it was amoral.
But womens love is conditional. The divorce rate speaks volumes to this. Silver divorces speak volumes to this. Single motherhood rates speak volumes to this.

2019-01-06 10:25:50 UTC  

While not amoral it is artifical and conditional

2019-01-06 10:26:01 UTC  

To them, it would be immoral to not lock down the greatest source of resources for them and their children.

2019-01-06 10:26:16 UTC  

That's how you're describing it

2019-01-06 10:26:33 UTC  

amoral and immoral are different.

2019-01-06 10:26:40 UTC  

It's their nature it's to further a species

2019-01-06 10:26:41 UTC  

And, no, women are not very good at morals.

2019-01-06 10:26:45 UTC  

<@396901899724521482> Fair enough, but I am describing it how it is. And nature is Amoral. Make no mistake. If rape works for reproducing nature will favor rape.

2019-01-06 10:26:48 UTC  

Someone said earlier, black pill eventually doesn't even matter to black pill. That's true. It was painful to digest, that we are just meat puppets, but it ends up very liberating, because I stopped pretending and beating myself up for not being some ideal person.

2019-01-06 10:27:00 UTC  

I would disagree

2019-01-06 10:27:05 UTC  

But to each their own morals

2019-01-06 10:27:23 UTC  

It's still moral. To them.

2019-01-06 10:27:37 UTC  

It's moral to me it just shouldn't be lied about

2019-01-06 10:27:42 UTC  

amoral - a meaning without and moral. Nature has no morality. It is only concerned with who passes on their genes and who does not.

2019-01-06 10:27:52 UTC  

Nature isn't even concerned about that.

2019-01-06 10:27:58 UTC  

What if we are God's unwanted step-children? so be it. We don't need him. --Fight Club

2019-01-06 10:28:12 UTC  

Enh, I'm a chill atheist.

2019-01-06 10:28:38 UTC  

<@396901899724521482> I'm curious about what parts of mgtow you'd agree with if you're against all these things

2019-01-06 10:28:46 UTC  

I don't need some man in the sky to tell me how to behave. There's perfectly rational, secular arguments to not be an absolute fuck knuckle.

2019-01-06 10:29:06 UTC  

immoral is the negation of morality. That is specifically going against morality as apposed to amoralitys lack of morality. There is overlap but they are different.

2019-01-06 10:29:25 UTC  

Well, if men define morality, then women are often immoral.

2019-01-06 10:29:48 UTC  

bonding is usually for a reason

2019-01-06 10:29:57 UTC  

We identify value in production over consumption, loyalty rather than mercenary, integrity or opportunism.

2019-01-06 10:30:05 UTC  

Why do you think that statistics arising then if not their biology

2019-01-06 10:30:46 UTC  

And the little ladies, when left unchecked, tend toward consumption, mercenary, and opportunism.

2019-01-06 10:31:07 UTC  

Wait, what conclusions do you disagree with?

2019-01-06 10:31:25 UTC  

Taking rights away and hypergamy it seems

2019-01-06 10:31:38 UTC  

Those aren't mgtow, those are more black pill and red pill rage responses.

2019-01-06 10:31:54 UTC  

Again mgtow is a philosophy

2019-01-06 10:32:02 UTC  

That is about men self actualizing

2019-01-06 10:32:06 UTC  

Not taking rights away

2019-01-06 10:32:06 UTC  

Yeah, none of those are core mgtow premises. Everything about mgtow is in the name.

2019-01-06 10:32:34 UTC  

it's the ultimate act of agency

2019-01-06 10:32:37 UTC  

It's beautiful.

2019-01-06 10:32:50 UTC  

what bothers me is how do we leave the talk about hypergamy and start talking about self actualization?

2019-01-06 10:33:24 UTC  

separate the red pill rage and black pills from mgtow core.

2019-01-06 10:33:50 UTC  

men going their own way.

2019-01-06 10:33:54 UTC  

chill people