All I can do is suggest you read Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex, by Julius Evola.

uh hu

i think your partially right

legitimately

homosexual relationships have the potential to just platonic sex

its happened to me its happened to people i know

but i've also had heterosexual relationships turn into that

"Platonic sex" is an oxymoron.

and i've seen homosexuals have long love filled relationships

depends on the context of platonic

if i'm talking platonic in the sexual sense obviously, but i clearly mean it in the emotional sense

Platonic love is a romantic relationship that is non-sexual.

it has multiple definitions either way you understand the point i was making

i could've gone with emotionless carnal acts but i didnt feel like typing that out

i think homosexual male relationships have a large potential to become totally sexual

but its not a rule

or a guarantee

I'm saying that with genuine platonic love, the beautiful or lovely other person inspires the mind and the soul and directs one's attention to spiritual things. Vulgar Eros is nothing but mere material attraction towards a beautiful body for physical pleasure and reproduction whilst Divine Eros begins the journey from physical attraction but transcends gradually to love for Supreme Beauty. Many homosexual relationships could be described as Divine Eros, however, in a society where homosexuality becomes accepted as a norm, it gradually becomes Vulgar Eros, materialistic and hedonistic.

Why are you presenting it as a dichotome thougj

>implying that hasnt been slowly happening to heterosexuals over the past millennium
>implying its inevitable

It is possible to have a relationship where sex is present, that isnt purely materialistic or fueled by lust

You can see this in Greece and Rome, as these societies began to decline in greatness. Richard Spencer is partially right when he says homosexuality was always part of European culture, but that dosen't mean it should be celebrated or widely accepted.

@Deleted User It has been happening to heterosexuals, I'm not arguing otherwise.

@Deleted User are you gay elliot rodgers?

Well, no. I just like Evola. Read Evola.

I dont think it should be accepted or celebrated

But sex inside of a relationship does not necessarily make it purely carnal

Incels desire casual sex to satisfy a primal urge, they don't seek true happiness, Devine Eros, and are totally unwilling to compete with rival males.

🆙 | **The Invisible Backhand leveled up!**

@Deleted User It's important for men to hold on to their semen; this re-energizes them and moves them towards self-mastery. "Virya, or spiritual manhood, if lost or wasted results in death and if withheld and conserved leads to life".

Okay so you can have a homosexual relationship where sex is present, but it doesnt become completely materialistic and actually is about the love between the two people instead of lust

Two completely incompatible concepts.

Holding your nut makes u a better person

Now this is peak esoteric

So bassicly you are saying sex is bad

Ye

Sex is disgusting.

Okay how are humans supposed to reproduce then?

If we shouldn't have sex?

Get married, and have sex for the purpose of reproduction.

oh your not even gay elliot rodgers your just regular elliot rodgers