also Where's Gabbard

in fact I just need to point out that's five names, not six

Ah, I forgot to include Yang

If were being honest, even with Gabbard polling 6% in New Hampshire, the DNC will never nominate her. Same goes for Yang.

well okay sure

being verified as Clinton's personal agency and considering she pulled out the 'russian asset' card

still, even if they don't win the general, someone needs to drag the public discussion toward an immediate withdrawal from the middle east

Always remember the DNC's hand in the 2016 nomination - Wikileaks outed Wasserman Shultz deliberately bombing Sanders campaign, despite being the more popular candidate.

It's painfully clear they'll back Biden, even if the popular vote favors Buttigieg or Sanders.

Basically Clinton's hand. The DNC was all but confirmed to be her personal weapon

Exactly. They'll choose an establishment candidate. Even one embroiled in controversy (Clinton email scandal 2016 - Biden's Ukraine scandal 2020)

Good luck backing a candidate with a crackhead son <:smugon:512048583806025739>

I'm so glad I don't have to listen to Wasserman-Schultz anymore. She was the fucking worst

I refuse to regard anything involving ukraine short of a nuclear strike to be a """"""""""scandal""""""""""

about as much of a scandal as the trump pornstar horseshit

and yes, no more DWS, agreed

I think its becoming obvious that politics in DC were moving away from the voters. The DNC thought it could heat the water up to full tier leftism and no one would notice.

Well they fucking did.

fun fact, in a TV interview between her and the congressman she ran against, she literally uttered the words "...the work we(the DNC) have put in to ensure Hillary Clinton would be the nominee..."

Imagine if we could strengthen the state governments and bring politics closer to the people 🤔

The DNC doesn't have a charismatic or popular candidate. The Democratic party being fractured between extremists, progressives, and moderates compounds the problem.

Oh no question DC is in a bubble of its own

has been and still is

Eh, @Jokerfaic?

Revolution seems like the only way forward to get these hacks out of our government.

Nah, I doubt anything that extreme will be needed

or otherwise some sort of unconventional direct action

the current conventions themselves are part of the problem

Well we've talked about border reform for what 60 years?

And it's finally kind of happening

It'll be hilarious if the border wall actually works

And I think it will

The executive order preventing Asylum seekers from countries not immediately bordering the US made more impact than a physical wall

I don't, but I won't try to hinder it

@Jokerfaic I consider it one of those things that it's better to have and not need, than to need and not have

I consider it a medieval solution to what is a far more complicated problem

for example, a majority, slim but still a majority, of illegals came over and simply overstayed their visas

what's a wall to do about that?

Build a wall around them when they fly in.

@Jokerfaic do you have a door to get into your house?

Does that door have a lock?