yea i understand that illyrian but you have to start somewhere to get them to admit these current settlements are even more shit right... because they even agreed to let palestine have the west bank

so its like... a double double cross...

dosn't Israel let palestines live inside Israel with out much hastle?

think rockraider... imagine we had a conflict with mexico ok

we wont focus on why it happened or anything we just say yk what... this is what happened and heres the new lines. and both countries leaders agree to the new lines

then america starts subsidizing and encouraging its citizens to set up towns and etc in the newly established and agreed upon lines of Mexico

then when they say hey stop that. we go NAH. this is israel tho

are we talking deap in the lines or near the lines where it could be disputed?

because land lines are not as clear as they are on a map.

yes within the established territory

well within... like i said

even the US gov

for decades agreed that these settlements were illegal

past a visable border, not something just drawn on a map?

so a river or road or something.

yep because what seperated the west bank from the east side is a river

so literally crossed a river.. into the west bank

and set up towns

and had kids and shit

what river

i think it is right. let me see

even then. like i said even the us gov agreed for decades these settlements were illegal

and even after being told to stop by many nations, they just continued

this isnt even talking about the stuff that occured BEFORE 1967

i'm looking on google earth right now and i don't see any land marks for what is marked as "1949 armistice agreement line" other then something that looks like a road form here.

so we are totally skipping over how they even got in the region

i'm looking for where you are talking about.

dude dont you think that once israelis moved into the place theyd remove markers and stuff come on.

all i see is a border that looks like it was drawn by someone haveing a seasure.

like i said its been a global consensus. of course its not going to say... HERE IS THE LAND THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PALESTINES

you know

ona nice little sign for you

I don't see the river you are talking about.

i was wrong about there being a river, there is not a river. but that doesnt take away from the point at hand. or diminish my argument here.

like i said the agreement of 1967 was very clear

if there were no clear landmarks then some of this could have been a mistake, as drawing such a land border would have been.

and then the installment of civilian settlements by israel and being globally recognized as illegal. is still true

so how come when they were told to stop, they didnt?

This just in: Palestine isn't a nation with a physical location.

well, it's near Narnia

even to THIS day