I

L

D

Under the age of maturity

Not a fully grown or mentally developed adult

I can keep going

well by that standard people under 25 are children

Have you talked to anyone under 25?

We are idiots

i wouldn't call us children though

Greta isn't even human imo

Someone under the age of 18 isnt an adult

They are a boy or girl not a woman or man

that's just legal fiction

The last thing we all need is to be lectured by a scientifically illiterate 16 year old white girl from sweden claiming we have stolen her dreams and her future

You can keep trying to defend her but you dont actually have any real points

There's like thousands of books on how futile it is to rail against the system.

Shes a child, she has no original thought, she knows nothing about the subject matter which is why she parrots people who do, and shes just an anti-western shill who has failed to mention that China is the single greatest polluter on earth.

And China doesnt care for your dreams and your future kiddo

there is no reason for someone under 18 to be voteing in national elections.

I could say that someone under 20 shouldn't be voteing in national elections.

I dont believe in universal suffrage period

Ive talked about it many times

I wouldn't even mind a higher age like 25 to 30, though I think getting people to think like an adult sooner is better.

i'm not defending her i don't really pay attention to her

I do think that any citizen over a set age should be able to vote, haveing something that could be subjective would just lead to people haveing their rights removed.

i don't think age should be a factor it should be based on your social role

I don't really agree with that because who desides what social roles get to vote?

What?

whoever institutes the system

well if that was the case then you would never have the option to vote, you would never find your self in a "social role" that had that privlige.

Is a Jew a social role?

no

and i don't see why rockraider

i mean, in a system that i would advocate for i wouldn't get a vote atm at least

because the people in power don't want you to vote, so you would never be in a "social role" that could vote.

(unless they know you would vote for them)

that doesn't make sense

If you have any subjective standard to when you can vote the people in power would change that standard to keep anyone who wouldn't vote for them form voteing.

i mean broadly speaking people in power don't really give you the option to vote them out

The criteria for voting solely being social role is ridiculous