Message from @Jokerfaic
Discord ID: 657114053310808064
You would be surprised how civics courses are absent from modern curriculum
Thanks, thats pretty helpful
Also - it's a rather specific question that *shouldn't* come up that often
Other than the pay line to read most of it
I'm sure I learned it at some point
pay line?
WSJ allows you to read 1-3 articles free every 24 hrs
After that, pay wall
Just forgot a lot of stuff due to a wild early twenties
I think I maxed out my 3
my civics was mostly how to interact with police, and what exactly they are and are not allowed to do under N-number of circumstances
We thankfully had a course outlying the structure of government, constitutional rights, and US history
@Joker That's really useful but a bit lacking
Now it's devolved into a preachy course on US History alone that abruptly stops around 2000.
well yeah constitutional rights came into it
different warrants, the legal penalties if police violate the terms of the warrant, exactly what you're obligated to cooperate with and to what length
Unfortunately that's what my history/civics was until I changed schools to one that actually valued education
reasonable suspicion, and such
had a different class for history, but it only started from the Spanish-American war onward
but that's less the schools fault and more the general faculty in general for literally railroading me into nothing but math, science, reading and writing for 11 fucking straight years
Gotta love the WSJ's subtle criticism -
They have failed to persuade the country; they have set a new, low standard for impeaching a President; Mr. Trump will be acquitted in the Senate; and Democrats may have helped Mr. Trump win re-election. *Congratulations to The Resistance.* <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Lmao
lel just wait till they get a dem president in, if they do in the future
Defintely true
the *resistance* that gave trump another bloated military budget increase, in case anyone noticed while this impeachment circus was going on
should go after impeachment so hard and then laugh in their face
Random question. Would anyone here consider voting for Tulsi Gabbard if she won
Not that I think she will win the primary
you mean if she became the primary candidate?
sure
Yeah
no
I've got a handful of die-hard Republican collogues that view Tulsi and Buttigieg has having the most competent viewpoints.
too pozzed
Buttigieg?!?!?
That being said, she doesn't take a strong enough stance.
i hopped off the tulsi train when she said shed support a committee to investigate reparations for blacks
From what I've seen she's the best democratic candidate they've had in generations
Bittigieg may has no chance in hell, but at least he can speak coherent fucking english.