Message from @nug700

Discord ID: 662478614230597642


2020-01-03 01:58:00 UTC  

i wonder if he had congressional approval

2020-01-03 01:58:01 UTC  

Well none war time drone strikes anyway

2020-01-03 01:58:07 UTC  

Wtf is Iran even gonna do about it

2020-01-03 01:58:12 UTC  

idk

2020-01-03 01:58:20 UTC  

They can't do nothing

2020-01-03 01:58:24 UTC  

The man was to important to the regime

2020-01-03 01:58:40 UTC  

I mean they can fuck up the embassy again if they act fast enough

2020-01-03 01:58:53 UTC  

Maybe

2020-01-03 02:01:28 UTC  

i mean... assasinating the second most powerful person in Iran without congressional approval might get him impeached X2

2020-01-03 02:01:52 UTC  

We'll have to see

2020-01-03 02:03:38 UTC  

i mean Trump's Iran policy is terrible

2020-01-03 02:04:35 UTC  

Well I mean

2020-01-03 02:04:53 UTC  

if Trump did it to "intimidate" or something, i think that'lll totally backfire, if anything Qassem will be a martyr

2020-01-03 02:05:00 UTC  

What president can threaten a country over twitter and then kill three prominent people from their government a few days later/

2020-01-03 02:05:59 UTC  

thing I'd be worried about is all the US personnel in the country.

2020-01-03 02:06:04 UTC  

Apparently trump ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2020-01-03 02:06:04 UTC  

Or even US citizens

2020-01-03 02:06:31 UTC  

things like vigilante justice could happen

2020-01-03 02:06:40 UTC  

well yeah, I'm sure this will stir up a massive regional war

2020-01-03 02:06:45 UTC  

revenge killings an all

2020-01-03 02:13:29 UTC  

Reading the dude runs a lot of terrorists activity so the strike could have been deliberate

2020-01-03 02:13:39 UTC  

ran*

2020-01-03 02:14:36 UTC  

Well actually drone strikes rarely kill civilians

2020-01-03 02:14:45 UTC  

This is kind of a strange thing that was pushed around in the media for a while

2020-01-03 02:15:12 UTC  

The supposed arguments for it killing a lot of civilians are that only 2% of the targets were high value targets, so therefore the rest must be civilians, which is kind of silly

2020-01-03 02:15:41 UTC  

Like salon and the guardian and all that based it on a "study" that looked at 2000 drone strikes and found that we only knew who the targets were ahead of time 2% of the time

2020-01-03 02:15:48 UTC  

That doesn't mean 98% of the targets were civilians

2020-01-03 02:16:32 UTC  

The figure was then changed to 400 civilians killed in drone strikes which would be a 20% death rate, which pakistan of all countries, who made the Taliban, then refuted by suggesting it would only be as high as 65 civilians killed out of 2000 drone strikes, or like 3%, vs. around 17 according to the U.S. estimate or, 1%

2020-01-03 02:17:37 UTC  

My intuition (aka educated guess) gives a number of 37

2020-01-03 02:17:54 UTC  

This would be at best like 2% of drone strikes result in civilian causalties

2020-01-03 02:18:08 UTC  

one of the main missiles we use is actually a kinetic missile, meaning it doesn't explode

2020-01-03 02:18:13 UTC  

it's actually designed to take out like 1-2 people

2020-01-03 02:18:29 UTC  

it would be hard to believe there's tons of civilian causalties from the smallest missle on our smallest plane that doesn't even explode

2020-01-03 02:18:56 UTC  

well i dont trust the US govs numbers

2020-01-03 02:18:59 UTC  

🤷‍♂️

2020-01-03 02:19:43 UTC  

You can see how the the blades open up and it just kills people by hitting them

2020-01-03 02:19:50 UTC  

You aren't going to get a lot of civiluan causalties from this

2020-01-03 02:20:28 UTC  

so as long as its only a few innocent civilians die its ok

2020-01-03 02:20:37 UTC  

👍

2020-01-03 02:20:49 UTC  

civilian deaths are inevitable in any war, if you can reduce the causalties, than it's good