so as long as its only a few innocent civilians die its ok

👍

civilian deaths are inevitable in any war, if you can reduce the causalties, than it's good

https://www.armyrecognition.com/may_2019_global_defense_security_army_news_industry/agm-114_r9x_hellfire_missile_modified_for_cia_kills_avoiding_collateral_damages.html

it was recently declassified

But anyways yeah there's not that many civilian deaths from this I imagine

I could imagine it's less than 2%

per drone strike

pakistan seems to agree which is strange

maybe we shouldnt have ever gone to the middle east in the first place. IMO its just a bunch of brown people fighting over sand, they are of no threat to the US

That's a whole other topic of discussion

But the reality is that drone's don't have 98% failure rates it's more like the opposite

right so saying civilian deaths are inevitable

is a moot point

because i dont think we should even be there.

I don't know why drones are seen as so bad in the public mind other than a few badly cited liberla media articles

its not a war thats justified so to me even 1 dead civilian is pointless

well, those nuclear deals trump wiggled out of, maybe we do need to be worried

they're really designed to reduce civilian causalties, and like usual the left just plays their role harder rather than admit they're trying to reduce civilian causalties

We were attacked in 9/11 for example

The response was against these terrorists

you mean the deals that let them get nukes for sure?

by the saudis yea

Afghanistan was freed largely from Taliban rule

yea

and we went to iraq

The suadis didn't do 9/11

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

yea they did lol

if you look into the declassified documents

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

We know that pakistan was more heavily involved

15 of the 17 hijackers were saudi arabian

Pakistan made the taliban, who then were allies with osama bin laden, who literally was less than a mile from their pakistan headquarters

Being from Suadi arabia doesn't mean the governmeant did it

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

or else Britain is responsible for ISIS who has tons of british fighters, or France and so on

That's kind of a silly argument

i didnt say the saudi gov did it

i said SAUDIS did it

Pakistan deliberately recruited Al-Qaeda operatives to commit the attacks