that's not melodramatic at all, I don't trust them to give me the info like it is.
and for whatever reason that is that's still how i feel.

based on an example which is false

@ARockRaider actually has a legal basis for the argument he's making: "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsus_in_uno%2C_falsus_in_omnibus?wprov=sfla1

dude, these are the same people who put out a vid that said "you didn't chose to be a nazi when you went into PvP in a WW2 game"
and then went on to say "we should find some way to make the not nazis be better to play!" or something to that point

in a series based on a subject matter far more open to interpretation. this has no bearing on the objectivity of their history series

>I don't trust this playlist because x
>wait, x isn't an accurate representation of what that playlist said
>I don't care, x is why I don't trust it

are you seeing yet why I'm losing patience with you

I don't trust them for several reasons and you keep going back to square one because i didn't put down just the right words for you.

so, i'm also loseing patience with you and you may note that i have not cussed at you once.

I keep going back to it because my point was their historical reviews are objective, and your refutation was built on false information

and you just keep avoiding addressing that

on top of that your defence of them saying that history isn't open to interpretation?
have you ever heard the saying "history is written by the winners"?

there is so much of history that we don't have the full story on, or only have half of one side of the story.

obfuscation and non-sequitors. Your claim was false, get over it.

my claim was that they said something that made me feel like they were not trust worthy.

and they just straight didn't fucking say what you claim they did

the exact point I haven't nailed down because A: you didn't give me the time and B: I don't think you would care what i said anyway.

and that's another cuss, you are up to what? 5?

on the contrary, if you provided a quote somewhere I'd have more reason to take you seriously and not as a contrarion whiner

you didn't give me the time

mute fucking discord or something then, christ, I wasn't even @ing you

I stright up told you it was over 50 min of content i had to go over to find what i was looking for.

.... who the fuck is ing

nvm

"
ARockRaiderToday at 10:35 PM
I haven't even gotten through the first half of the first vid, can you give me a bit?

JokerfaicToday at 10:36 PM
whatever :/"

yes, I talk a lot

I didn't have class today, I'm lack of better shit to do

that "whatever" seemed like a "I don't care what you have to say" to me.

I was confident in my analysis of the content over yours, but would have welcomed either a "here, see, this is what I was referring to" or a "huh, alright, fair enough, I heard it wrong"

and you didn't even give me the time to re-check the over 50min of content to nail down what had upset me in the first place.
so I don't think that i had heard anything wrong at this point, i think you are just mad because i don't like the content creator that you like and you are ranting and cussing at me because of it.

no, i don't think they said outright "free market bad"
I think it was much more subtle then that and i might have just over reacted over a year ago.

oh give me a fucking break, I wasn't in your room holding a gun to your head. I had no way of stopping you from tabbing out and finding your evidence. quit being a fucking baby

and more cussing, why must you do that? and then call me a baby? how does that help you at all?

And pointing that out seems like a really convenient way for you to avoid addressing the content of the message

We're speaking over the god damn internet. Its not in my power to give you or take away your time. pinning your lack of motivation to substanciate your arguments on me is juvenile.

oh hay, turns out that i found some of the stuff that i was talking about before the 7min mark in the first vid.

now, if i were to take what i'm seeing now i would say that their outright distain for landowners may have been a part of it.
I know at one point in time where I was very defencive against such additudes because i feel they are not takeing into account the idea that (in the US at least) there isn't normally a systematic land takeover that would cause the probles they bring up in the vid.

and the fact british officials had dispossessed Irish catholic landowners and set up a system of absentee land bureaucratic spiderwebbing had *nothing* to do with how the British landlords were portrayed

sure, its just shitting on ownership of land

might have, you are still gonna give me time to more time to listen to all of it in it's whole

its not within my power to "give you time", jesus christ