Message from @SilverKestral

Discord ID: 674460946348900355


2020-02-05 03:41:43 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2020-02-05 03:41:57 UTC  

Could you imagine what would have happened if Paul Ryan tore up Obama’s SOTU Address

2020-02-05 03:42:10 UTC  

UBI is just a bad idea, something given has no value. And the people that it would mean something to would immediately lose that extra cash to raised prices on consumer goods

2020-02-05 03:42:12 UTC  

He would have been Thrown in Prison and Summarily Executed

2020-02-05 03:42:20 UTC  

An absolute meltdown from CNN?<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2020-02-05 03:42:35 UTC  

I’m sure Vox and Huffpost would have something to say about that!

2020-02-05 03:42:38 UTC  

UBI would have the potential to work, the problem is we have too many people

2020-02-05 03:42:53 UTC  

Is CNN streaming a response? Anyone got a link?

2020-02-05 03:42:58 UTC  

Obama may not have had the policies of a communist, but he sure assassnated people like one!

2020-02-05 03:43:16 UTC  

UBI while having MASS IMMIGRATION will not WORK. and i do not TRUST yang to stop the mass IMMIGRATION

2020-02-05 03:43:18 UTC  

😠

2020-02-05 03:43:37 UTC  

@Omar_The_OMAP exactly, UBI is a socialist idea. And as such requires a secondary system to drain resources from

2020-02-05 03:43:47 UTC  

UBI could work somewhere like Lichtenstein, Iceland, or another Small Homogenous country, but not in a nation with 325 Million people and a disastrous Immigration system

2020-02-05 03:44:34 UTC  

We need true lightly regulated capitalism!!

2020-02-05 03:45:27 UTC  

Charles Murray had a UBI plan but in it UBI *replaced* all other welfare spending. While not excellent his argument was that it would be a net reduction in spending.

2020-02-05 03:45:55 UTC  

I’m awaiting the “Nancy epically owns Blumbpf 3000 by ripping up his speech;is this the end for Drubumbpf?” News articles

2020-02-05 03:46:05 UTC  

whether deregulation or increasing regulations, it should always be in the interest of small business first

2020-02-05 03:46:24 UTC  

I can’t wait to see Trump’s tweet about it

2020-02-05 03:46:38 UTC  

He’ll probably tweet on the ride back to the White House lmao

2020-02-05 03:46:56 UTC  

Or when he gets back to the WH for the post SOTU Shit

2020-02-05 03:47:00 UTC  

Welp I'm gonna go see whats new vees nsfw chat, later.

2020-02-05 03:47:18 UTC  

@SilverKestral the answer is furries

2020-02-05 03:47:25 UTC  

It's always furries

2020-02-05 03:47:32 UTC  

what we need is to scrap the current welfare system

2020-02-05 03:47:38 UTC  

Vore. Lots and lots of vore...

2020-02-05 03:47:43 UTC  

and if we have one AT ALL it needs to incentivize the right things

2020-02-05 03:47:51 UTC  

getting married. having a family. etc.

2020-02-05 03:47:53 UTC  

being employed.

2020-02-05 03:47:57 UTC  

Yang doesn't support what you claimed

2020-02-05 03:47:57 UTC  

things like this.

2020-02-05 03:48:17 UTC  

yea to yangs credit he did stand up against that

2020-02-05 03:48:23 UTC  

but my beef with yang is on gun control

2020-02-05 03:48:24 UTC  

Welfare in general is a shit idea, the state can't and shouldn't be a substitute parent for people

2020-02-05 03:48:57 UTC  

Yep furries and a debate about thighs.

2020-02-05 03:49:02 UTC  

i do think the gov can incentivize families to stay together @randomNPCno3

2020-02-05 03:49:12 UTC  

it just needs to be debated how to do so

2020-02-05 03:50:00 UTC  

traditional families are important to american society, so itd be ideal to incentivize more of that

2020-02-05 03:50:01 UTC  

Remove welfare, child support, and alimony. Done

2020-02-05 03:50:09 UTC  

I get iffy on government incentives, I think that the state should be reactionary. And stick to disincentives for things that have been proven to be an issue

2020-02-05 03:50:34 UTC  

Now people have to make smart choices when choosing a partner because govt isn't coming to bail them out