British virus that's largely and mainly attacking China?

It's a matter of ascertaining the origin of the virus to understand the intent of the spread. There will be geopolitical consequences because of this irrespective of it all, but I could see China engineering a virus like this to cull their male population to try to achieve gender parity.

I could also see the crown doing some shit like this as well
https://nwo.fandom.com/wiki/Prince_Philip_-_%E2%80%9CIf_I_were_reincarnated_I_would...be...as_a_killer_virus...%22

https://twitter.com/CarlHigbie/status/1225071984712802304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1225071984712802304&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F02%2Fpelosi-was-mandated-to-preserve-trumps-signed-copy-of-his-sotu-speech-she-tore-it-up-instead%2F

Someone should Sue her then

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/383859670499983371/674644652338708491/FB_IMG_1580918212587.jpg

So Let me get this straight so trump's speech is a official government document

Correct?

@ComradeChaos I wouldn't be so quick to point towards the patent or the article as some sorta gotcha, considering that "Coronavirus" refers to a GROUP of viruses (of which SARS and MERS are apart of)

I'm not trying to: I just found the claim interesting

From what I'm seeing, the Patent refers to SARS, not 2019-nCoV

Because the virus seems to be more deadly to asian men

It's a misled or purposely fearmongering claim

I'm gonna gonna assume the former just to be safe

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck Maybe they took genetic material from some of the pneumonia inducing strains listed and put it in the viral envelope of a bat coronavirus?

bruh

okay

first off

"bat coronavirus" is vague

I can be very specific

one second

I'm 99% sure that ALL of the Coronavirus variants came from bats

https://globalnews.ca/news/3899630/sars-china-bat-cave-new-outbreak/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/AVP78033.1
This one right here @SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/19/11/13-1172_article

@JewishBastard As far as we know

>>Using different viral envelope proteins that recognize different receptors can vary the range of cells that can be transduced, but still does not provide much specificity. The difficulty is that, because retroviral vectors cannot be generated at a high titer, it is not possible to get a large number of vector particles to the desired cell type in vivo. The viral particles would bind to many cells they encounter and therefore, would be diluted out before reaching their target.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722627/

Are you starting to get it?

You use a vehicle that targets receptors that statistically occur more in one group of people

MERS came from Betacoronavirus, as did SARS and the new strain

Did you look at the first link that I sent you

I did

@Wizard_of_The_West hm.

that's what I mentioned betacoronavirus

>>envelope protein [Bat SARS-like coronavirus]

```Viruses; Riboviria; Nidovirales; Cornidovirineae; Coronaviridae;
Orthocoronavirinae; Betacoronavirus; Sarbecovirus.```

It mentions the VIRAL ENVELOPE

it is the outer sheath

That's not the virus itself

You can inject genetic code into that sheath and use that as a vehicle for your gene therapy or disease

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/viral+envelope
Viral Envelopes seem kinda natural, though.