Message from @SilverKestral
Discord ID: 676984922770243584
Whenever I read her name I think of Fablucher from Young Frankenstein
Oh, alright
FALBLUCHER! *whinnying horses*
she is literally repeating her iowa speech!
Booker with 49 votes
Im not even joking
@SilverKestral On their own, no. But be careful, it isn't over. I'm sure the DNC still has plenty of tricks left
@SilverKestral 12:08 p.m.: New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner is predicting turnout of some 420,000 voters (292,000 Democratic ballots and 128,000 Republican ballots.) If he's right, that would be the most votes cast in a presidential primary featuring an incumbent president.
However, on a phone call with reporters Monday, New Hampshire Democratic chair Ray Buckley said, "I don't think anyone is predicting anywhere near the 2008 turnout. I think we will have a terrific turnout. It will certainly be higher than any other state in the entire nominating process. But there's no indication we'll match or be near 2008."
but that's 9 hours ago
9:21 PM
To some extent, turnout is catching up to the 2008 Democratic primary. Looking at just the municipalities that have reported 100 percent of the vote, turnout is running 4 percent behind 2008, but 10 percent ahead of the turnout in the same places in the 2016 primary.
from fivethrityeight.com's coverage
also worth noting: independents can vote in this primary
Not much movement in the percentages
Klobie is picking up 25% of the female vote according to exit polls, outperforming all other candidates
53% in:
Sanders 35,704 26.8 3
Buttigieg 31,283 23.5 3
Klobuchar 26,273 19.7 0
Warren 12,689 9.5 0
Biden 11,217 8.4 0
Bernie is slowing down
http://prntscr.com/r10qrd
Disgusting~
59% in:
Sanders 40,882 26.0 6
Buttigieg 37,531 23.9 6
Klobuchar 31,662 20.1 3
Warren 14,902 9.5 0
Biden 13,228 8.4 0
getting within the margin of error there, could Buttplug win the big towns and get 1st place?
I really hope not
On the other hand, if he wins in the primaries Trump can just pretty much ignore him
oh boi, whose hoping for the dems to accidentally strengthen trump again by cheating?
GEOFFREY SKELLEY10:03 PM
You know, earlier tonight turnout looked to be lagging a bit behind the 2008 Democratic primary and slightly ahead of the 2016 race. But since then, it’s looking more likely it’ll match 2008. Looking at places that are 100 percent reporting and comparing their turnout in 2008 and 2016, the 2020 Democratic primary is now only 1 percent behind turnout in 2008 and is about 14 percent ahead of the 2016 primary.
Ehh, eventually odds are they'll do something that weakens him
64% in:
Sanders 44,508 25.9 6
Buttigieg 41,343 24.1 6
Klobuchar 34,458 20.1 4
Warren 16,247 9.5 0
Biden 14,451 8.4 0
the front 2 are converging in real time
It’s sad to see Yang drop out
CNN had Tulsi at 3.3
@Object of Hate You're doing amazing work. Thank you kind sir
you're welcome @Troye , elections coverage are my speciality
at least when I don't have a plane to catch the next morning, like during the UK one
Sanders 46,859 26.1 6
Buttigieg 42,778 23.8 6
Klobuchar 35,807 19.9 4
Warren 16,900 9.4 0
Biden 14,970 8.3 0
that's at 66% in, two thirds!
I guess Communism and faggotry are attractive to Democrats <:smugon:512048583806025739>