So, what the hell? It's a bombshell that Assange made a claim in court that the WikiLeaks organization is now debunking?

If you can, work for his campaign and get money. Don't even have to do anything. They're going for quantity over quality.

You could even do the opposite and take his money while actually canvasing for another candidate.

That it is being twisted by US Media for another Orange Man Bad point... Or that Assanage's lawyer is throwing garbage out there.

how do i sign up to be a ctr shill?

Oh yes... Michael Bloomberg is a swell guy *Coughs* 💰 *Coughs* Hmm... I can get plenty of cough medicine now~

Bloomberg's campaign is also offering free phones and laptops. If you can, bleed him dry.

Shit, I'll make a Twitter account for that kinda money!

tag me in bloomer

Just as an aside, given all the spicy takes we've heard come out of Bloomberg's mouth, I truly believe he doesn't see people as human beings at this point.

Just walking efficiency percentages and dollar signs.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/02/19/trump-names-richard-grenell-acting-director-of-national-intelligence/?utm_source=breaking_news&utm_medium=banner

Good

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PezvKetZ34k

That's not too surprising

Didn't Assange claim that there was no Russian interference months ago anyway

Why request he do it again?

Strange to me. Before Trump was elected... After Trump elected... He always denied Russia being a source.

Apparently, it's a statement Assange made in court.

If he were to take that back now he is running over his own credibility.

If Assange made that statement, that Trump offered him a pardon for him to say Russia isn't involved in the leaks, then, I don't know, maybe he lost his mind.

So many holes that don't make sense. Never mind this point of contact that didn't leak at all from the incredibly leaky White House.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/394036-How-Comey-intervened-to-kill-Wikileaks-immunity-deal

"""leaks"""

never really verified any of this shit

Oh~

Trump would trade immunity for the source.

That would make sense... Assange never would give up his sources. Trump would want the source. If he could get Seth Rich? That would destroy the Democrat Russia Narrative forever.

No wonder they are throwing up so much shit with this.

i don't know why he won't say seth rich was the source. first of all, the guy is dead. second of all, revealing him as the source would strongly imply he was murdered for it. and lastly what's the point of revealing corruption if you subsequently hamper the efforts to bring justice to those responsible?

he's just autistic as fuck.

the whole point of having an organization that reveals corruption is to bring justice to the corrupt.

if you don't do that, what the fuck are you fucking doing?

does assange think that he can get a pardon and just go right back to doing wikileaks stuff? does he think that people will come to him and leak stuff just like before, like nothing ever happened?

Cannot say... He is facing 175 years in the US. I hate to think he would hold information of Seth Rich as a wild card~ To hold it behind his 'Never give up a source' mentality.

The point of "Never give up a source" is that if you do so, you'll be cut off from all future sources. Assange doesn't *have* any future sources.

Even if all charges were dropped tomorrow, no strings attached, no one in their right mind would talk to him about anything secret.

Dude will be watched like a hawk for the rest of his life by every intelligence agency on the planet and all of silicon valley too.

Anyone who talks to him will be signalling to every spook in the five eyes that they're a snitch.

True enough but one has to consider he went from someone taking in these secrets to what he is today. Likely stayed true to never giving up a source as he transitioned into... "Oh shit... I need something to bargain with!"

Now his lawyer puts on a show for the world. See where they can work out those... Deals with the cards he is still holding.